Compare
Benalla vs Tungamah
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 44 km apart · Benalla profile · Tungamah profile
Benalla Tungamah
Benalla and Tungamah (L) are two nearby Victorian areas with very different profiles. Benalla is much larger and more diverse, with a far higher share of recent overseas arrivals (17.8% compared to 0.0% in Tungamah (L)) and a larger proportion of residents who finished Year 12 (38.7% versus 20.5%). Renting is also far more common in Benalla, where 27.7% of households rent and the typical weekly rent is $255, while in Tungamah (L), only 12.9% rent and the typical weekly rent is much lower at $150.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for the share of people providing unpaid care. They are also similar in that full-time employment is about 55% for both. While Tungamah (L) is more walkable for groceries and schools, Benalla has a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services. Over time, the gap in Year 12 completion has widened, while the difference in the number of people living alone has narrowed.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,124
- First area, 2016: 9,932
- First area, 2021: 9,742
- Second area, 2011: 222
- Second area, 2016: 462
- Second area, 2021: 348
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 57 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Benalla: 1.9% males, 3.2% females; 85+ in Tungamah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Benalla: 2.1% males, 2.7% females; 80–84 in Tungamah: 1.7% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Benalla: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Tungamah: 1.4% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Benalla: 3.8% males, 4.4% females; 70–74 in Tungamah: 4.6% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Benalla: 3.2% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Tungamah: 5.2% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Benalla: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Tungamah: 3.5% males, 4.9% females
- 55–59 in Benalla: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Tungamah: 3.8% males, 7.0% females
- 50–54 in Benalla: 2.6% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Tungamah: 5.8% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Benalla: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Tungamah: 1.2% males, 2.0% females
- 40–44 in Benalla: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Benalla: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Tungamah: 1.2% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Benalla: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Tungamah: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Benalla: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Benalla: 2.5% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Benalla: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Tungamah: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Benalla: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 10–14 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 5–9 in Benalla: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Tungamah: 4.1% males, 0.9% females
- 0–4 in Benalla: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Tungamah: 4.6% males, 5.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $471
- First area, 2016: $567
- First area, 2021: $636
- Second area, 2011: $536
- Second area, 2016: $787
- Second area, 2021: $537
- First area, 2011: $811
- First area, 2016: $956
- First area, 2021: $1,107
- Second area, 2011: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,586
- Second area, 2021: $966
- First area, 2011: $1,088
- First area, 2016: $1,333
- First area, 2021: $1,485
- Second area, 2011: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,828
- Second area, 2021: $1,266
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $266
- First area, 2021: $255
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $150
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $873
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Benalla with nearby areas
Compare Tungamah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Benalla vs Tungamah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL214003/benalla/vs/UCL222094/tungamah