Compare
Dookie vs Tungamah
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 25 km apart · Dookie profile · Tungamah profile
Dookie Tungamah
Tungamah (L) and Dookie (L) are two small Victorian towns with very different profiles. Dookie (L) has a more qualified workforce, with 43.3% of residents completing Year 12 compared to 20.5% in Tungamah (L), and a typical weekly household income that is $258 higher. Dookie (L) also has far more large homes, with 92.5% having three or more bedrooms, while Tungamah (L) is more mobile, with a far higher share of people who moved in the last five years (35.7% compared to 24.3%).
Both areas sit around the national figure for the share of children under 15. They are also similar in that almost every home is within a 15-minute walk of a park and no one in either town commutes by public transport. While the two towns share these basics, they have drifted apart in other ways since 2011; the gap in full-time employment has widened, and the difference in the typical age of residents has grown to four years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 346
- First area, 2016: 246
- First area, 2021: 260
- Second area, 2011: 222
- Second area, 2016: 462
- Second area, 2021: 348
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 57 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 57 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dookie: 0.0% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Tungamah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Dookie: 0.0% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Tungamah: 1.7% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Dookie: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Tungamah: 1.4% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Dookie: 3.1% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Tungamah: 4.6% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Dookie: 3.4% males, 1.1% females; 65–69 in Tungamah: 5.2% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Dookie: 5.7% males, 6.9% females; 60–64 in Tungamah: 3.5% males, 4.9% females
- 55–59 in Dookie: 3.1% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Tungamah: 3.8% males, 7.0% females
- 50–54 in Dookie: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Tungamah: 5.8% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Dookie: 1.1% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Tungamah: 1.2% males, 2.0% females
- 40–44 in Dookie: 3.1% males, 6.1% females; 40–44 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Dookie: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 35–39 in Tungamah: 1.2% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Dookie: 1.1% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Tungamah: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Dookie: 1.9% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Dookie: 2.3% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Dookie: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Tungamah: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Dookie: 5.3% males, 5.3% females; 10–14 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 5–9 in Dookie: 1.9% males, 5.0% females; 5–9 in Tungamah: 4.1% males, 0.9% females
- 0–4 in Dookie: 3.1% males, 1.1% females; 0–4 in Tungamah: 4.6% males, 5.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $528
- First area, 2016: $444
- First area, 2021: $675
- Second area, 2011: $536
- Second area, 2016: $787
- Second area, 2021: $537
- First area, 2011: $1,181
- First area, 2016: $695
- First area, 2021: $1,224
- Second area, 2011: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,586
- Second area, 2021: $966
- First area, 2011: $1,312
- First area, 2016: $885
- First area, 2021: $1,458
- Second area, 2011: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,828
- Second area, 2021: $1,266
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 1.9
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $140
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $150
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $650
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $873
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dookie with nearby areas
Compare Tungamah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dookie vs Tungamah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL222020/dookie/vs/UCL222094/tungamah