Compare
Bundalong vs Tungamah
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 30 km apart · Bundalong profile · Tungamah profile
Bundalong Tungamah
Bundalong (L) and Tungamah (L) are two small Victorian areas with very different living patterns. Bundalong (L) has a more highly qualified workforce, with 15.1% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to just 3.1% in Tungamah (L). Housing costs are also much higher in Bundalong (L), where the typical weekly rent is $360, while in Tungamah (L) it is $150. Bundalong (L) is more car-dependent, whereas Tungamah (L) is very walkable, with 99.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park and 100% near a school.
The typical age of residents is exactly the same in both places, at 52 years. While they share this age profile, many other gaps have grown since 2011. For example, the difference in typical household income has widened, with Bundalong (L) now earning $483 more per week than Tungamah (L). Bundalong (L) has also seen its lead in university qualifications and home-loan payments increase significantly over the last few years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 349
- First area, 2016: 318
- First area, 2021: 405
- Second area, 2011: 222
- Second area, 2016: 462
- Second area, 2021: 348
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 53 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 57 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundalong: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Tungamah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bundalong: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Tungamah: 1.7% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Bundalong: 1.0% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Tungamah: 1.4% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Bundalong: 5.5% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Tungamah: 4.6% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Bundalong: 3.8% males, 5.3% females; 65–69 in Tungamah: 5.2% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Bundalong: 5.3% males, 5.5% females; 60–64 in Tungamah: 3.5% males, 4.9% females
- 55–59 in Bundalong: 5.0% males, 5.5% females; 55–59 in Tungamah: 3.8% males, 7.0% females
- 50–54 in Bundalong: 4.8% males, 4.5% females; 50–54 in Tungamah: 5.8% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Bundalong: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Tungamah: 1.2% males, 2.0% females
- 40–44 in Bundalong: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Bundalong: 3.0% males, 1.8% females; 35–39 in Tungamah: 1.2% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Bundalong: 0.8% males, 1.5% females; 30–34 in Tungamah: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Bundalong: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 25–29 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Bundalong: 1.0% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bundalong: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Tungamah: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Bundalong: 3.3% males, 2.0% females; 10–14 in Tungamah: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 5–9 in Bundalong: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Tungamah: 4.1% males, 0.9% females
- 0–4 in Bundalong: 1.5% males, 1.8% females; 0–4 in Tungamah: 4.6% males, 5.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $615
- First area, 2016: $598
- First area, 2021: $708
- Second area, 2011: $536
- Second area, 2016: $787
- Second area, 2021: $537
- First area, 2011: $1,523
- First area, 2016: $1,268
- First area, 2021: $1,449
- Second area, 2011: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,586
- Second area, 2021: $966
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,593
- First area, 2021: $1,656
- Second area, 2011: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,828
- Second area, 2021: $1,266
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $360
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $150
- First area, 2011: $1,365
- First area, 2016: $1,500
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $873
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.60
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundalong with nearby areas
Compare Tungamah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundalong vs Tungamah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL222012/bundalong/vs/UCL222094/tungamah