Compare
Castlemaine vs Daylesford - Hepburn Springs
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 32 km apart · Castlemaine profile · Daylesford - Hepburn Springs profile
Castlemaine Daylesford - Hepburn Springs
Castlemaine and Daylesford - Hepburn Springs are two nearby Victorian towns with distinct layouts and demographics. Castlemaine is more walkable for many, with 79.6% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport and 93.9% within 15 minutes of a park. Daylesford - Hepburn Springs has a more international feel, with a well higher share of people born overseas (18.3% compared to 13.3% in Castlemaine) and a higher proportion of people using another language at home. Residents in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs are also noticeably older, with a typical age of 54.
The age gap between the two areas has narrowed since 2011, falling from nine years to four. Both towns share very similar typical weekly household incomes, around $1,200, and have almost identical proportions of people who have served in the Defence Force. While both are far older than the national figure, they share a similar trend of having many residents who identify as having no religion, a figure that sits well above the national average in both locations.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,820
- First area, 2016: 12,952
- First area, 2021: 10,577
- Second area, 2011: 2,768
- Second area, 2016: 2,139
- Second area, 2021: 3,732
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Castlemaine: 1.6% males, 2.9% females; 85+ in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 2.7% females
- 80–84 in Castlemaine: 1.7% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.4% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 4.1% females; 70–74 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 65–69 in Castlemaine: 3.7% males, 4.4% females; 65–69 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.0% males, 5.2% females
- 60–64 in Castlemaine: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.5% males, 5.7% females
- 55–59 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.4% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 3.7% males, 4.7% females
- 45–49 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Castlemaine: 2.5% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.3% males, 1.5% females
- 10–14 in Castlemaine: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 0–4 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $470
- First area, 2016: $549
- First area, 2021: $683
- Second area, 2011: $430
- Second area, 2016: $739
- Second area, 2021: $718
- First area, 2011: $801
- First area, 2016: $948
- First area, 2021: $1,196
- Second area, 2011: $751
- Second area, 2016: $1,441
- Second area, 2021: $1,205
- First area, 2011: $1,056
- First area, 2016: $1,226
- First area, 2021: $1,667
- Second area, 2011: $948
- Second area, 2016: $1,672
- Second area, 2021: $1,738
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $240
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $340
- First area, 2011: $1,257
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,470
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Castlemaine with nearby areas
Compare Daylesford - Hepburn Springs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Castlemaine vs Daylesford - Hepburn Springs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL213002/castlemaine/vs/UCL215029/daylesford-hepburn-springs