Compare
Bundaberg vs Emerald
Urban Area comparison ≈ 451 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Emerald profile
Bundaberg Emerald
Bundaberg and Emerald are two distinct Queensland centres with very different profiles. Bundaberg is much older, with a typical resident aged 45 and 25.7% of people aged 65 and over. In contrast, Emerald is far younger, with a typical age of 32 and a much higher share of children under 15 (25.2% compared to Bundaberg's 17.0%). This divide extends to income and housing; typical household weekly income is far higher in Emerald at $2,190, while Bundaberg is much lower at $1,186. Consequently, Bundaberg has many more homes owned outright (37.7%), whereas Emerald has a much higher share of renters at 44.7%.
Everyday life in both places shares some common ground, such as a similar proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents (around 5.3%) and an almost identical share of people who speak little or no English (1.0%). However, the gaps between the two are often widening. Since 2011, the age difference has grown from 2 years to 13 years, and the gap in typical personal income has increased from $120 to $416. While Bundaberg's typical resident is noticeably older than the national figure, Emerald's is noticeably younger.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 133,911
- First area, 2016: 144,787
- First area, 2021: 73,747
- Second area, 2011: 41,966
- Second area, 2016: 43,871
- Second area, 2021: 14,089
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Emerald: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Emerald: 0.2% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Emerald: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 70–74 in Emerald: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Emerald: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Emerald: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Emerald: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Emerald: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Emerald: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Emerald: 4.3% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Emerald: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Emerald: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Emerald: 4.4% males, 4.6% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Emerald: 3.8% males, 3.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $631
- First area, 2016: $697
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $751
- Second area, 2016: $722
- Second area, 2021: $1,033
- First area, 2011: $1,164
- First area, 2016: $1,339
- First area, 2021: $1,186
- Second area, 2011: $1,848
- Second area, 2016: $1,690
- Second area, 2021: $2,190
- First area, 2011: $1,414
- First area, 2016: $1,613
- First area, 2021: $1,472
- Second area, 2011: $2,058
- Second area, 2016: $2,031
- Second area, 2021: $2,510
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $285
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,668
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $2,037
- Second area, 2016: $1,993
- Second area, 2021: $1,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Emerald with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Emerald [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/3003/bundaberg/vs/3005/emerald