Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Emerald
Urban Area comparison ≈ 304 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Emerald profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Emerald
Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld) and Emerald are two distinct Queensland regions with very different profiles. Residents are far older in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld), where the typical age is 44 compared to 32 in Emerald. This age gap helps explain why homes are owned outright by 39.0% of people in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld), while Emerald has a much younger, more mobile population where 44.7% of homes are rented. Emerald also sees far higher typical weekly household incomes, at $2,190 compared to $1,328 in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld).
Both areas are similar in that very few people speak little or no English, with shares of 0.8% and 1.0% sitting close to the national figure. Since 2011, many of the gaps between the two have widened. The difference in typical age has doubled from 6 to 12 years, and the gap in the share of adults working or looking for work has grown to 20 percentage points. Emerald has also become more walkable, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of schools and parks than in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 755,689
- First area, 2016: 758,150
- First area, 2021: 751,871
- Second area, 2011: 41,966
- Second area, 2016: 43,871
- Second area, 2021: 14,089
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Emerald: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.2% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Emerald: 0.2% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Emerald: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Emerald: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Emerald: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Emerald: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Emerald: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Emerald: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Emerald: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Emerald: 4.3% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Emerald: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Emerald: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Emerald: 4.4% males, 4.6% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Emerald: 3.8% males, 3.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $502
- First area, 2016: $560
- First area, 2021: $656
- Second area, 2011: $751
- Second area, 2016: $722
- Second area, 2021: $1,033
- First area, 2011: $1,010
- First area, 2016: $1,152
- First area, 2021: $1,328
- Second area, 2011: $1,848
- Second area, 2016: $1,690
- Second area, 2021: $2,190
- First area, 2011: $1,209
- First area, 2016: $1,369
- First area, 2021: $1,626
- Second area, 2011: $2,058
- Second area, 2016: $2,031
- Second area, 2021: $2,510
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $218
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,500
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $2,037
- Second area, 2016: $1,993
- Second area, 2021: $1,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Emerald with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Emerald [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/3000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/3005/emerald