Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Bundaberg
Urban Area comparison ≈ 731 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Bundaberg profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Bundaberg
Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld) and Bundaberg are very different in how people get around. Bundaberg is somewhat walkable, while Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld) is car-dependent. In Bundaberg, 78% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to just 3.5% in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld). Other big gaps include the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, which is well higher in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld) at 9.6%, and the number of separate houses, which is also well higher there at 91.6%.
The gap in the number of people working from home has widened since 2011, with 11.4% doing so in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Qld) compared to 4.8% in Bundaberg. Despite this, the two places are quite similar in other ways. They have almost the same typical weekly personal income, around $617 to $656, and very similar shares of people using a language other than English at home. Most homes in both areas have three or more bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 755,689
- First area, 2016: 758,150
- First area, 2021: 751,871
- Second area, 2011: 133,911
- Second area, 2016: 144,787
- Second area, 2021: 73,747
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.2% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $502
- First area, 2016: $560
- First area, 2021: $656
- Second area, 2011: $631
- Second area, 2016: $697
- Second area, 2021: $617
- First area, 2011: $1,010
- First area, 2016: $1,152
- First area, 2021: $1,328
- Second area, 2011: $1,164
- Second area, 2016: $1,339
- Second area, 2021: $1,186
- First area, 2011: $1,209
- First area, 2016: $1,369
- First area, 2021: $1,626
- Second area, 2011: $1,414
- Second area, 2016: $1,613
- Second area, 2021: $1,472
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $218
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $285
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,500
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,668
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Bundaberg [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/3000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/3003/bundaberg