Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 1,335 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are very different in how people get around. Bounded Locality is somewhat walkable, with 51.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of both groceries and schools. In contrast, Rural Balance is car-dependent, where only 4.3% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 5.3% are near a school. Bounded Locality also has a higher share of people living alone (30.6% compared to 22.3%) and a higher typical weekly rent, which is $250 compared to $200 in Rural Balance.
Both areas sit near the national figure for adults working or looking for work, with Rural Balance at 61.9% and Bounded Locality at 54.3%. They are also similar in the share of people born overseas, at around 11%. While Rural Balance has more people in full-time work, the gap between the two has widened since 2011. Meanwhile, the gap in the number of older residents has narrowed over the same period.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 99,962
- First area, 2016: 98,824
- First area, 2021: 94,668
- Second area, 2011: 136,802
- Second area, 2016: 142,568
- Second area, 2021: 145,402
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 4.1% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.6% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.5% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $462
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $671
- Second area, 2011: $529
- Second area, 2016: $623
- Second area, 2021: $734
- First area, 2011: $883
- First area, 2016: $1,030
- First area, 2021: $1,284
- Second area, 2011: $1,071
- Second area, 2016: $1,274
- Second area, 2021: $1,491
- First area, 2011: $1,129
- First area, 2016: $1,330
- First area, 2021: $1,689
- Second area, 2011: $1,273
- Second area, 2016: $1,498
- Second area, 2021: $1,841
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,213
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS22/bounded-locality/vs/SOS43/rural-balance