Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 565 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are two very different environments. Bounded Locality is far more walkable, with a score of 4.2 (somewhat walkable), while Rural Balance is car-dependent with a score of 0.7. This is seen in the distance to services; for example, 56.1% of homes in Bounded Locality are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 5.2% in Rural Balance. Rural Balance is also more likely to have an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, at 5.7% compared to 1.7% in Bounded Locality.
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked in different directions across several measures. The gap in the number of seniors has narrowed, though Bounded Locality remains higher at 24.5%. At the same time, the gap in typical weekly household income has widened, with Rural Balance now slightly higher at $1,426. Despite these shifts, they remain very similar in other ways, such as having an almost identical share of children under 15 and the same typical weekly rent of $250.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 99,962
- First area, 2016: 98,824
- First area, 2021: 94,668
- Second area, 2011: 95,671
- Second area, 2016: 98,715
- Second area, 2021: 107,361
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.0% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.0% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.4% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $462
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $671
- Second area, 2011: $487
- Second area, 2016: $568
- Second area, 2021: $690
- First area, 2011: $883
- First area, 2016: $1,030
- First area, 2021: $1,284
- Second area, 2011: $995
- Second area, 2016: $1,170
- Second area, 2021: $1,426
- First area, 2011: $1,129
- First area, 2016: $1,330
- First area, 2021: $1,689
- Second area, 2011: $1,186
- Second area, 2016: $1,401
- Second area, 2021: $1,736
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $180
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,213
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,250
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,350
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS22/bounded-locality/vs/SOS63/rural-balance