Compare
Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality
Section of State comparison ≈ 953 km apart · Rural Balance profile · Bounded Locality profile
Rural Balance Bounded Locality
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are very different places located nearly 1,000km apart. Rural Balance is an older area where the typical resident is 47 and 20.5% of people are aged 65 or over. In contrast, Bounded Locality is much younger, with a typical age of 29. Bounded Locality has a far higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (72.7% compared to 2.8% in Rural Balance) and more people who use a language other than English at home (65.5% versus 4.7%). Income also differs greatly; typical weekly family income in Rural Balance is $1,841, which is far higher than the $871 seen in Bounded Locality.
While they differ in many ways, the two areas are almost identical when it comes to the typical weekly household income, which sits around $1,400 for both. However, many other gaps have widened since 2011, including a growing difference in home ownership and the age of residents. Bounded Locality is also far more walkable, with many more homes within a 15-minute walk of schools and groceries, while Rural Balance remains largely car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 136,802
- First area, 2016: 142,568
- First area, 2021: 145,402
- Second area, 2011: 24,865
- Second area, 2016: 26,270
- Second area, 2021: 24,165
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Bounded Locality: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 0.5% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Rural Balance: 4.1% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 1.8% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.5% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.5% females
- 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.6% females
- 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.5% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 4.4% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 4.4% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $529
- First area, 2016: $623
- First area, 2021: $734
- Second area, 2011: $297
- Second area, 2016: $336
- Second area, 2021: $337
- First area, 2011: $1,071
- First area, 2016: $1,274
- First area, 2021: $1,491
- Second area, 2011: $1,276
- Second area, 2016: $1,328
- Second area, 2021: $1,389
- First area, 2011: $1,273
- First area, 2016: $1,498
- First area, 2021: $1,841
- Second area, 2011: $825
- Second area, 2016: $876
- Second area, 2021: $871
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 3.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.7
- Second area, 2021: 3.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $150
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2016: $60
- Second area, 2021: $80
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,400
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.60
- Second area, 2016: 1.40
- Second area, 2021: 1.40
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS43/rural-balance/vs/SOS72/bounded-locality