Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 356 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are two different types of environments, separated by over 350 km. Bounded Locality is much more accessible, described as somewhat walkable, while Rural Balance is car-dependent. In Bounded Locality, 56.1% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 51.5% are near a school, whereas in Rural Balance, only 6.7% can walk to groceries and 11.8% to a school. Rural Balance is wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $1,659 and a higher share of people working from home (21.5%) compared to Bounded Locality, where the typical income is $1,284 and 14.0% work from home.
Since 2011, the gap in household incomes has widened, though the difference in the age of residents has remained steady. Both areas have similar proportions of children under 15 and a nearly identical share of people born overseas. They also share the same typical weekly rent of $250. While Bounded Locality has more people living alone (30.6% compared to 21.0% in Rural Balance), both areas have a population of seniors that sits well above the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 99,962
- First area, 2016: 98,824
- First area, 2021: 94,668
- Second area, 2011: 398,717
- Second area, 2016: 414,055
- Second area, 2021: 428,903
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.4% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $462
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $671
- Second area, 2011: $521
- Second area, 2016: $615
- Second area, 2021: $752
- First area, 2011: $883
- First area, 2016: $1,030
- First area, 2021: $1,284
- Second area, 2011: $1,117
- Second area, 2016: $1,328
- Second area, 2021: $1,659
- First area, 2011: $1,129
- First area, 2016: $1,330
- First area, 2021: $1,689
- Second area, 2011: $1,317
- Second area, 2016: $1,555
- Second area, 2021: $1,978
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $180
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,213
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,408
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS22/bounded-locality/vs/SOS23/rural-balance