Compare
Condamine vs Ipswich West
State Electorate comparison ≈ 99 km apart · Condamine profile · Ipswich West profile
Condamine Ipswich West
Condamine and Ipswich West are two Queensland areas with very different layouts. Ipswich West is far more urban, with 34.1% of homes rented compared to 20.4% in Condamine. This urban nature is clear in the walkability and transport data; Ipswich West has a far higher number of public transport stops and weekly departures, and more homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, parks and health services. In contrast, Condamine is more rural, with much smaller average school sizes and far more schools per 1,000 children. These areas also differ in their beliefs, as 43.6% of people in Ipswich West report no religion, while the figure is much lower in Condamine at 30.3%.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people in de facto relationships. They are also very similar in terms of typical weekly household income, which is $1,654 in Condamine and $1,561 in Ipswich West. While residents in Condamine are noticeably older, with a typical age of 39 compared to 36 in Ipswich West, this gap has narrowed since 2011. Other similarities include a nearly identical share of children under 15 and the same percentage of people using a language other than English at home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 48,653
- First area, 2016: 51,151
- First area, 2021: 55,300
- Second area, 2011: 52,788
- Second area, 2016: 58,495
- Second area, 2021: 53,840
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Condamine: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Ipswich West: 0.6% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Condamine: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Ipswich West: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Condamine: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Ipswich West: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Condamine: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Ipswich West: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Condamine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Ipswich West: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Condamine: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Ipswich West: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Condamine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Ipswich West: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Condamine: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Ipswich West: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Condamine: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Ipswich West: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Ipswich West: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Condamine: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Ipswich West: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Ipswich West: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Condamine: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Ipswich West: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Ipswich West: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Condamine: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Ipswich West: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Condamine: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Ipswich West: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Condamine: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Ipswich West: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Condamine: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Ipswich West: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $734
- First area, 2016: $847
- First area, 2021: $769
- Second area, 2011: $497
- Second area, 2016: $535
- Second area, 2021: $761
- First area, 2011: $1,756
- First area, 2016: $2,025
- First area, 2021: $1,654
- Second area, 2011: $1,145
- Second area, 2016: $1,287
- Second area, 2021: $1,561
- First area, 2011: $2,025
- First area, 2016: $2,272
- First area, 2021: $1,940
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $1,377
- Second area, 2021: $1,885
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $425
- First area, 2021: $295
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $310
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,600
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Condamine with nearby areas
Compare Ipswich West with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Condamine vs Ipswich West [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30020/condamine/vs/SED30038/ipswich-west