Compare
Condamine vs Ipswich
State Electorate comparison ≈ 116 km apart · Condamine profile · Ipswich profile
Condamine Ipswich
Condamine and Ipswich are both Queensland areas with similar population sizes, but they offer very different lifestyles. Ipswich is much more walkable, with a score of 5.8 (somewhat walkable) compared to Condamine's 1.8 (car-dependent). This is reflected in the local amenities; 74.1% of Ipswich homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 19.2% of Condamine homes are. Housing and faith also differ sharply, with 38.3% of Ipswich households renting and 43.6% of residents having no religion, while Condamine sees far more outright home ownership at 34.8% and much lower rates of people with no religion (30.3%).
These two areas are remarkably alike in other ways, including their typical weekly personal incomes, which sit around $760. They also share very similar proportions of children under 15 and adults with a bachelor's degree. While they are similar in these respects, some gaps are shifting; for example, residents in Condamine are now noticeably older than those in Ipswich, a trend that has flipped since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 48,653
- First area, 2016: 51,151
- First area, 2021: 55,300
- Second area, 2011: 46,283
- Second area, 2016: 52,783
- Second area, 2021: 50,518
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Condamine: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Ipswich: 0.7% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Condamine: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Ipswich: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Condamine: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Ipswich: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Condamine: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Ipswich: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Condamine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Ipswich: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Condamine: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Ipswich: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Condamine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Ipswich: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Condamine: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Ipswich: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Condamine: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Ipswich: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Ipswich: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Condamine: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Ipswich: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Ipswich: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Condamine: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Ipswich: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Ipswich: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Condamine: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Ipswich: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Condamine: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Ipswich: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Condamine: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Ipswich: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Condamine: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Ipswich: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $734
- First area, 2016: $847
- First area, 2021: $769
- Second area, 2011: $568
- Second area, 2016: $657
- Second area, 2021: $761
- First area, 2011: $1,756
- First area, 2016: $2,025
- First area, 2021: $1,654
- Second area, 2011: $1,144
- Second area, 2016: $1,307
- Second area, 2021: $1,481
- First area, 2011: $2,025
- First area, 2016: $2,272
- First area, 2021: $1,940
- Second area, 2011: $1,369
- Second area, 2016: $1,535
- Second area, 2021: $1,854
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $425
- First area, 2021: $295
- Second area, 2011: $220
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,700
- Second area, 2021: $1,480
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Condamine with nearby areas
Compare Ipswich with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Condamine vs Ipswich [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30020/condamine/vs/SED30037/ipswich