Condamine · State Electorate

Walkability in Condamine

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 19.2% of homes in Condamine are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, a gap that is far below the Queensland figure. This car-dependent area has very few local amenities, with only about 20% of households having a 15-minute-city walkshed.

Open map →
📍 Condamine, State Electorate

Where Condamine sits — Walkability score

1.8 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Condamine — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Condamine1.8
Rest of Qld 4.2
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Condamine by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 1.8, which means the area is car-dependent. This is far below the Queensland figure of 5.0, and residents have access to far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk than the state average.

1.8

Car-dependent of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

2.0

Lower than 98% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

20.5%

Lower than 97% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Parks are the most accessible amenity, with 51.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk. In contrast, health services are the hardest to reach, with only 15.6% of homes nearby and 75% of residents living more than 30 minutes away from the nearest one.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 6.1%, which is about the same as the Queensland figure. There is one intersection per square kilometre, and there are 10.5 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well below the state average.

10.5

Lower than 86% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.1%

Higher than 64% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Condamine

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Condamine [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED30020/condamine/topic/walkability