Compare
Condamine vs Nanango
State Electorate comparison ≈ 117 km apart · Condamine profile · Nanango profile
Condamine Nanango
Condamine and Nanango are two regional Queensland areas with distinct demographic profiles. Condamine has a younger population and more families, with 21.2% of people under 15 compared to 17.0% in Nanango. This younger feel is reflected in the housing; 88.3% of Condamine homes have three or more bedrooms, far higher than the 75.1% in Nanango. Condamine also has a more active workforce, with 63.9% of adults working or looking for work, while Nanango's figure is much lower at 47.5%.
The gap in the typical age of residents has widened since 2011, with Nanango now far older at 48 compared to 39 in Condamine. Both areas remain car-dependent and share similar rates of volunteering and a low use of other languages at home. While Condamine tends to have higher typical incomes, the difference between the two has narrowed over the last decade. In both places, about 30% of people are in a de facto relationship and very few use public transport to commute.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 48,653
- First area, 2016: 51,151
- First area, 2021: 55,300
- Second area, 2011: 47,785
- Second area, 2016: 50,313
- Second area, 2021: 52,491
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Condamine: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Condamine: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Condamine: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Condamine: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Condamine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Condamine: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Condamine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Condamine: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Condamine: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Condamine: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Condamine: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Condamine: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Condamine: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Condamine: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Condamine: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Condamine: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $734
- First area, 2016: $847
- First area, 2021: $769
- Second area, 2011: $421
- Second area, 2016: $495
- Second area, 2021: $541
- First area, 2011: $1,756
- First area, 2016: $2,025
- First area, 2021: $1,654
- Second area, 2011: $847
- Second area, 2016: $1,006
- Second area, 2021: $1,069
- First area, 2011: $2,025
- First area, 2016: $2,272
- First area, 2021: $1,940
- Second area, 2011: $998
- Second area, 2016: $1,221
- Second area, 2021: $1,334
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $425
- First area, 2021: $295
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $230
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Condamine with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Condamine vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30020/condamine/vs/SED30063/nanango