Compare
Bundamba vs Scenic Rim
State Electorate comparison ≈ 49 km apart · Bundamba profile · Scenic Rim profile
Bundamba Scenic Rim
Scenic Rim and Bundamba are nearby areas with very different own-pace of life. Scenic Rim is much older, with a typical resident aged 44 and 20.7% of people aged 65 and over. It is also more likely to be home-owned, with 36.2% of houses owned outright. In contrast, Bundamba is far younger, with a typical resident aged 30 and a much higher share of renters at 47.8%. Bundamba is also more diverse, with 28.1% of people born overseas and 20.3% using another language at home, compared to just 14.6% and 3.4% in Scenic Rim.
The gap in typical age has widened since 2011, growing from a 2-year difference to 14 years. Despite this, the two areas share similar typical weekly household incomes, sitting around $1,520. They are also alike in the share of people needing help with daily activities, both at 6.5%. While Bundamba is somewhat walkable, Scenic Rim is car-dependent, with far fewer people living within walking distance of shops or public transport.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 47,663
- First area, 2016: 52,351
- First area, 2021: 71,499
- Second area, 2011: 54,482
- Second area, 2016: 59,729
- Second area, 2021: 54,621
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundamba: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Scenic Rim: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Bundamba: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Scenic Rim: 1.1% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Bundamba: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Scenic Rim: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Bundamba: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Scenic Rim: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Bundamba: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Scenic Rim: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Bundamba: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Scenic Rim: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Bundamba: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Scenic Rim: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Bundamba: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Scenic Rim: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Bundamba: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Scenic Rim: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Scenic Rim: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Bundamba: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Scenic Rim: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Scenic Rim: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Scenic Rim: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Scenic Rim: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Bundamba: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Scenic Rim: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Bundamba: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Scenic Rim: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Bundamba: 4.7% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Scenic Rim: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Bundamba: 4.5% males, 4.2% females; 0–4 in Scenic Rim: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $874
- First area, 2016: $992
- First area, 2021: $745
- Second area, 2011: $495
- Second area, 2016: $563
- Second area, 2021: $691
- First area, 2011: $1,861
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $1,529
- Second area, 2011: $1,012
- Second area, 2016: $1,177
- Second area, 2021: $1,516
- First area, 2011: $2,267
- First area, 2016: $2,541
- First area, 2021: $1,716
- Second area, 2011: $1,231
- Second area, 2016: $1,422
- Second area, 2021: $1,817
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $429
- First area, 2021: $335
- Second area, 2011: $335
- Second area, 2016: $365
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,881
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,750
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundamba with nearby areas
Compare Scenic Rim with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundamba vs Scenic Rim [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30010/bundamba/vs/SED30075/scenic-rim