Compare
Greenway vs Kambah
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.7 km apart · Greenway profile · Kambah profile
Greenway Kambah
Kambah and Greenway are neighbouring areas with very different housing styles and lifestyles. Kambah is dominated by separate houses, with 84.6% of homes being detached and 89.6% having three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Greenway is primarily made up of flats or apartments, where 43.4% of people live alone and 38.8% of homes are rented. Kambah also has a higher share of top earners, with 32.7% of households making $3,000 or more a week, compared to 19.9% in Greenway.
Both areas share similar basics, such as having almost identical rates of people with long-term health conditions. This common ground exists alongside stark contrasts in mobility and demographics. Greenway is far more transient, with 73.2% of residents moving in the last five years, and has a much higher share of people born overseas (31.1%) and those speaking a First Nations language (18.4%). Greenway is also more connected, with a much higher number of public transport departures and a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,454
- First area, 2016: 1,894
- First area, 2021: 4,129
- Second area, 2011: 15,449
- Second area, 2016: 14,900
- Second area, 2021: 15,670
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Greenway: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Kambah: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Greenway: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Kambah: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Greenway: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Kambah: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Greenway: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Kambah: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Greenway: 2.1% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Kambah: 2.7% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Greenway: 1.9% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Kambah: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Greenway: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Kambah: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Greenway: 2.1% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Kambah: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Greenway: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Kambah: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Greenway: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Kambah: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Greenway: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Kambah: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Greenway: 6.3% males, 5.9% females; 30–34 in Kambah: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Greenway: 6.5% males, 6.7% females; 25–29 in Kambah: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Greenway: 3.9% males, 4.4% females; 20–24 in Kambah: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Greenway: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 15–19 in Kambah: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Greenway: 1.2% males, 1.0% females; 10–14 in Kambah: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Greenway: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Kambah: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Greenway: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Kambah: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $986
- First area, 2016: $1,030
- First area, 2021: $1,197
- Second area, 2011: $880
- Second area, 2016: $917
- Second area, 2021: $1,070
- First area, 2011: $1,699
- First area, 2016: $1,686
- First area, 2021: $1,857
- Second area, 2011: $1,861
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $2,207
- First area, 2011: $2,026
- First area, 2016: $2,142
- First area, 2021: $2,341
- Second area, 2011: $2,163
- Second area, 2016: $2,258
- Second area, 2021: $2,630
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.0
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $420
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $345
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,888
- First area, 2016: $1,652
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,993
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Greenway with nearby areas
Compare Kambah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Greenway vs Kambah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80066/greenway/vs/SAL80082/kambah