Compare
Chapman vs Kambah
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.4 km apart · Chapman profile · Kambah profile
Chapman Kambah
Kambah and Chapman are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory with very different profiles. Chapman is a wealthier area where 49.4% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 32.2% in Kambah. Higher incomes are more common in Chapman, where 49.4% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, while Kambah's figure is 32.7%. Chapman also has a much higher proportion of First Nations residents who speak a traditional language (32.1% versus 6.6% in Kambah) and a higher share of homes owned outright.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining quite alike in several key ways. They have nearly identical shares of children under 15 and very similar household sizes, with about 2.6 or 2.7 people per home. They also share similar drive times to the city and almost the same level of school advantage. While Chapman is noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 47 compared to 41 in Kambah, both areas sit well above the national figure for the proportion of people aged 65 and over.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,723
- First area, 2016: 2,684
- First area, 2021: 2,867
- Second area, 2011: 15,449
- Second area, 2016: 14,900
- Second area, 2021: 15,670
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Kambah: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Chapman: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Kambah: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 75–79 in Kambah: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Kambah: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Chapman: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Kambah: 2.7% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Kambah: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Kambah: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Chapman: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Kambah: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Kambah: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Chapman: 2.7% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Kambah: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Chapman: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Kambah: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Kambah: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Chapman: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Kambah: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Chapman: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Kambah: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Kambah: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Chapman: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Kambah: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Chapman: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Kambah: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Chapman: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Kambah: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,029
- First area, 2016: $1,188
- First area, 2021: $1,378
- Second area, 2011: $880
- Second area, 2016: $917
- Second area, 2021: $1,070
- First area, 2011: $2,595
- First area, 2016: $2,697
- First area, 2021: $3,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,861
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $2,207
- First area, 2011: $2,824
- First area, 2016: $3,192
- First area, 2021: $3,490
- Second area, 2011: $2,163
- Second area, 2016: $2,258
- Second area, 2021: $2,630
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $345
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,993
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chapman with nearby areas
Compare Kambah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chapman vs Kambah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80034/chapman/vs/SAL80082/kambah