Compare
Chisholm vs Gilmore
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Chisholm profile · Gilmore profile
Chisholm Gilmore
Chisholm and Gilmore are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory. Chisholm is larger, with more than 5,000 residents, and has far higher rates of recorded offences, including theft and motor vehicle theft. Gilmore has better access to amenities; far more of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of health services, groceries, and a general 15-minute-city walkshed. However, Chisholm has far more public transport stops and a higher number of schools within 3 km.
Everyday life is very similar in both places, with the typical resident being 37 years old and an equal share of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. They both have a similar proportion of children and people born overseas. This shared profile is also seen in their household incomes, which are both much higher than the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 2,843
- Second area, 2016: 2,750
- Second area, 2021: 2,706
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Gilmore: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Gilmore: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Gilmore: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Gilmore: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Gilmore: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Gilmore: 4.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $863
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,164
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $1,873
- Second area, 2016: $2,161
- Second area, 2021: $2,416
- First area, 2011: $2,196
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,104
- Second area, 2016: $2,371
- Second area, 2021: $2,725
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,048
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Gilmore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80037/chisholm/vs/SAL80062/gilmore