Compare
Chisholm vs Fadden
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.4 km apart · Chisholm profile · Fadden profile
Chisholm Fadden
Chisholm (ACT) and Fadden are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory with distinct profiles. Fadden is a more affluent area, where 44.9% of adults have a bachelor degree or higher and 51.9% of households earn $3,000 or more each week, compared to 23.4% and 32.0% in Chisholm (ACT). Fadden also has a much higher share of homes owned outright (44.9% versus 28.8%) and a larger First Nations presence, with 16.1% of people speaking a First Nations language. Chisholm (ACT) is more walkable, with 40.7% of homes in a 15-minute-city walkshed compared to just 2.5% in Fadden.
Everyday life in both places is similar in many ways, as they share nearly identical rates of people providing unpaid care and a high preference for separate houses. Both areas also have similar transit times to the city and a comparable share of people who do not follow a religion. While Fadden has a noticeably older population, with a typical resident aged 43 compared to 37 in Chisholm (ACT), the two areas have tracked together in their crime rates, with both seeing a fall over the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 3,083
- Second area, 2016: 2,949
- Second area, 2021: 3,006
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Fadden: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Fadden: 0.5% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Fadden: 1.7% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Fadden: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Fadden: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Fadden: 4.0% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Fadden: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Fadden: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Fadden: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Fadden: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Fadden: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Fadden: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Fadden: 2.0% males, 1.1% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Fadden: 2.8% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Fadden: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Fadden: 3.2% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Fadden: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Fadden: 3.1% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $1,054
- Second area, 2016: $1,197
- Second area, 2021: $1,415
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $2,693
- Second area, 2016: $2,757
- Second area, 2021: $3,302
- First area, 2011: $2,196
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,803
- Second area, 2016: $3,009
- Second area, 2021: $3,557
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $620
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,299
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Fadden with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Fadden [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80037/chisholm/vs/SAL80051/fadden