Compare
Chisholm vs Macarthur
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Chisholm profile · Macarthur profile
Chisholm Macarthur
Chisholm and Macarthur are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory. Macarthur has a more highly qualified and wealthier population, with 36.3% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 23.4% in Chisholm. This is consistent with incomes being well higher in Macarthur, where the typical household earns $3,037 a week, while the typical household in Chisholm earns $2,292. Chisholm is much better connected by public transport, with 100% of homes within a 10-minute walk of a stop and far more frequent services than its neighbour.
Both areas are similarly somewhat walkable and have almost identical shares of children under 15, at around 21%. They also share a similar outlook on religion, with about 41% of residents in both places reporting no religion. While they share these basic traits, the two areas differ in their housing and safety profiles, with Chisholm having far higher rates of recorded offences and Macarthur having a far higher share of homes owned outright.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 1,460
- Second area, 2016: 1,427
- Second area, 2021: 1,405
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Macarthur: 0.4% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Macarthur: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Macarthur: 1.1% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Macarthur: 3.1% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Macarthur: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Macarthur: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Macarthur: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Macarthur: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Macarthur: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Macarthur: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Macarthur: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Macarthur: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Macarthur: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Macarthur: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Macarthur: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Macarthur: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Macarthur: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Macarthur: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $1,032
- Second area, 2016: $1,133
- Second area, 2021: $1,334
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $2,737
- Second area, 2016: $2,680
- Second area, 2021: $3,037
- First area, 2011: $2,196
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,780
- Second area, 2016: $2,856
- Second area, 2021: $3,232
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $450
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Macarthur with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Macarthur [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80037/chisholm/vs/SAL80088/macarthur