Compare
Fadden vs Gilmore
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Fadden profile · Gilmore profile
Fadden Gilmore
Fadden and Gilmore (ACT) are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes, but they differ sharply in wealth and education. Fadden has a much more qualified workforce, with 44.9% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 23.4% in Gilmore (ACT). This is consistent with higher incomes in Fadden, where 51.9% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, well above the 36.1% in Gilmore (ACT). Residents in Fadden also more commonly own their homes outright, while Gilmore (ACT) has a far higher share of renters.
Daily life in both places is similar in many ways, such as the typical number of people per home and the 16 to 17 minute drive to the city. However, the two areas offer different levels of convenience; Gilmore (ACT) is very walkable and most of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of schools, health services, and groceries. In contrast, Fadden is only somewhat walkable and far fewer homes have such easy access to those services. This difference in layout is mirrored in crime patterns, with Gilmore (ACT) seeing a far higher rate of recorded offences.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,083
- First area, 2016: 2,949
- First area, 2021: 3,006
- Second area, 2011: 2,843
- Second area, 2016: 2,750
- Second area, 2021: 2,706
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fadden: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Gilmore: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Fadden: 0.5% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Gilmore: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Fadden: 1.7% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Gilmore: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Fadden: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Gilmore: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Fadden: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Fadden: 4.0% males, 4.5% females; 60–64 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Fadden: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Fadden: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Fadden: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Fadden: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Fadden: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Fadden: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Gilmore: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Fadden: 2.0% males, 1.1% females; 25–29 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Fadden: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Fadden: 3.5% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Fadden: 3.2% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Fadden: 3.0% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Gilmore: 4.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Fadden: 3.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,054
- First area, 2016: $1,197
- First area, 2021: $1,415
- Second area, 2011: $863
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,164
- First area, 2011: $2,693
- First area, 2016: $2,757
- First area, 2021: $3,302
- Second area, 2011: $1,873
- Second area, 2016: $2,161
- Second area, 2021: $2,416
- First area, 2011: $2,803
- First area, 2016: $3,009
- First area, 2021: $3,557
- Second area, 2011: $2,104
- Second area, 2016: $2,371
- Second area, 2021: $2,725
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $500
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $620
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,299
- First area, 2021: $2,383
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,048
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Fadden with nearby areas
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fadden vs Gilmore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80051/fadden/vs/SAL80062/gilmore