Compare
Chisholm vs Conder
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Chisholm profile · Conder profile
Chisholm Conder
Chisholm (ACT) and Conder are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes. Chisholm (ACT) is dominated by detached houses, which make up 95.8% of homes, and has a higher rate of motor vehicle theft. Conder is more varied in its housing and has a far higher number of schools per 1,000 children. It also has a well higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week, at 39.8% compared to 32.0% in Chisholm (ACT).
Everyday life is very similar in both places, as they share the same typical resident age of 37 and an almost identical share of children under 15. Both areas have a similar proportion of First Nations people and a similar percentage of adults with a university degree. While Conder generally has better access to health services and groceries within a 15-minute walk, both areas have seen their crime rates fall over the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 5,313
- Second area, 2016: 5,059
- Second area, 2021: 5,108
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Conder: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Conder: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Conder: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Conder: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Conder: 3.9% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Conder: 4.2% males, 4.9% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Conder: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Conder: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Conder: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Conder: 3.9% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Conder: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Conder: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Conder: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Conder: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $903
- Second area, 2016: $946
- Second area, 2021: $1,179
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $2,148
- Second area, 2016: $2,226
- Second area, 2021: $2,574
- First area, 2011: $2,196
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,313
- Second area, 2016: $2,479
- Second area, 2021: $2,907
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,123
- Second area, 2016: $2,087
- Second area, 2021: $2,148
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Conder with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Conder [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80037/chisholm/vs/SAL80039/conder