Compare
Conder vs Richardson
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.5 km apart · Conder profile · Richardson profile
Conder Richardson
Conder and Richardson are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory. Conder is a higher-earning area, with a typical household income of $2,574 and a far higher share of households earning $3,000 or more each week (39.8%) compared to Richardson (26.3%). Conder also has more residents with a bachelor degree or higher (24.3%) and better access to local amenities; for example, 53.1% of Conder homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 29.1% in Richardson. Richardson is more dominated by separate houses, which make up 96.1% of its homes compared to 80.7% in Conder.
These two areas share many characteristics, with almost identical proportions of children under 15 and people who speak little or no English. They also have very similar rates of long-term health conditions and people needing help with daily activities. Both areas sit well above the national figure for typical household incomes, though the gap between them has remained significant in recent years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,313
- First area, 2016: 5,059
- First area, 2021: 5,108
- Second area, 2011: 3,133
- Second area, 2016: 3,006
- Second area, 2021: 3,058
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Conder: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Richardson: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Conder: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Richardson: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Conder: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Conder: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Richardson: 2.9% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Conder: 3.9% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Conder: 4.2% males, 4.9% females; 50–54 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Conder: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Richardson: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Conder: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Conder: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Conder: 3.9% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Conder: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Conder: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Conder: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Conder: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $903
- First area, 2016: $946
- First area, 2021: $1,179
- Second area, 2011: $781
- Second area, 2016: $863
- Second area, 2021: $1,012
- First area, 2011: $2,148
- First area, 2016: $2,226
- First area, 2021: $2,574
- Second area, 2011: $1,632
- Second area, 2016: $1,840
- Second area, 2021: $2,043
- First area, 2011: $2,313
- First area, 2016: $2,479
- First area, 2021: $2,907
- Second area, 2011: $1,844
- Second area, 2016: $2,061
- Second area, 2021: $2,327
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $391
- First area, 2011: $2,123
- First area, 2016: $2,087
- First area, 2021: $2,148
- Second area, 2011: $1,869
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Conder with nearby areas
Compare Richardson with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Conder vs Richardson [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80039/conder/vs/SAL80114/richardson