Compare
Chapman vs Holder
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Chapman profile · Holder profile
Chapman Holder
Chapman and Holder (ACT) are neighbouring areas with similar populations, yet they differ in wealth and housing. Chapman is the more affluent of the two, with a typical weekly household income of $3,111 and a higher share of homes owned outright (48.7% compared to 38.2% in Holder (ACT)). Residents in Chapman are also noticeably older, with a typical age of 47 compared to 41 in Holder (ACT). Holder (ACT) stands out for its better access to local services, with a far higher number of schools per 1,000 children (3.81 versus 1.93 in Chapman) and more homes within a 15-minute walk of health services and groceries.
These two areas are almost identical when it comes to the number of public transport stops and the share of people born overseas. They also both have an unemployment rate that is very low. While they share these traits, the gap in housing types is clear, with separate houses being far more common in Chapman. At the same time, crime rates have fallen in both places over the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,723
- First area, 2016: 2,684
- First area, 2021: 2,867
- Second area, 2011: 2,711
- Second area, 2016: 2,606
- Second area, 2021: 2,816
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Holder: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Chapman: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Holder: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 75–79 in Holder: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Holder: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Chapman: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Holder: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Holder: 2.0% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Holder: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Chapman: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Holder: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Holder: 3.6% males, 4.4% females
- 40–44 in Chapman: 2.7% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Holder: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Chapman: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Holder: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Holder: 2.7% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Chapman: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Holder: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Chapman: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Holder: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Holder: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Chapman: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Holder: 3.6% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Chapman: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Holder: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Chapman: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Holder: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,029
- First area, 2016: $1,188
- First area, 2021: $1,378
- Second area, 2011: $919
- Second area, 2016: $1,073
- Second area, 2021: $1,273
- First area, 2011: $2,595
- First area, 2016: $2,697
- First area, 2021: $3,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,772
- Second area, 2016: $2,039
- Second area, 2021: $2,338
- First area, 2011: $2,824
- First area, 2016: $3,192
- First area, 2021: $3,490
- Second area, 2011: $2,203
- Second area, 2016: $2,493
- Second area, 2021: $2,915
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $371
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $465
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,008
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chapman with nearby areas
Compare Holder with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chapman vs Holder [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80034/chapman/vs/SAL80074/holder