Compare
Chapman vs Waramanga
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Chapman profile · Waramanga profile
Chapman Waramanga
Chapman and Waramanga are neighbouring areas in the ACT with similar population sizes. They differ most in age and wealth; the typical resident in Chapman is far older at 47, compared to 38 in Waramanga. This older profile in Chapman is consistent with a higher share of homes owned outright (48.7% versus 32.2% in Waramanga) and a typical weekly household income that is well higher at $3,111. Waramanga is more likely to have renters and recent arrivals from overseas, who make up 13.8% of its population compared to just 2.7% in Chapman.
Both areas have tracked closely since 2011, including a nearly identical drop in the crime rate over five years. They share very similar levels of unemployment and have roughly the same proportion of people born overseas. This common ground continues in their transport links, as both have 21 public transport stops and a two-minute walk to the nearest stop. However, Waramanga is much more walkable, with 100% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,723
- First area, 2016: 2,684
- First area, 2021: 2,867
- Second area, 2011: 2,597
- Second area, 2016: 2,629
- Second area, 2021: 2,785
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Waramanga: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Chapman: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Waramanga: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 75–79 in Waramanga: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Waramanga: 1.9% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Chapman: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Waramanga: 2.5% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Waramanga: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Waramanga: 2.8% males, 1.7% females
- 50–54 in Chapman: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Waramanga: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Waramanga: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Chapman: 2.7% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Waramanga: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Chapman: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Waramanga: 4.1% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Waramanga: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Chapman: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Waramanga: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Chapman: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Waramanga: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Waramanga: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Chapman: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Waramanga: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Chapman: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Waramanga: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Chapman: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Waramanga: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,029
- First area, 2016: $1,188
- First area, 2021: $1,378
- Second area, 2011: $904
- Second area, 2016: $991
- Second area, 2021: $1,179
- First area, 2011: $2,595
- First area, 2016: $2,697
- First area, 2021: $3,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,681
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $2,247
- First area, 2011: $2,824
- First area, 2016: $3,192
- First area, 2021: $3,490
- Second area, 2011: $2,180
- Second area, 2016: $2,503
- Second area, 2021: $2,920
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $290
- Second area, 2016: $305
- Second area, 2021: $379
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,137
- Second area, 2021: $2,175
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Chapman with nearby areas
Compare Waramanga with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chapman vs Waramanga [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80034/chapman/vs/SAL80130/waramanga