Compare
Calder vs Mount Hicks
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.1 km apart · Calder profile · Mount Hicks profile
Calder Mount Hicks
Mount Hicks and Calder are neighbouring areas in Tasmania that differ sharply in age and housing. Mount Hicks is far older, with a typical resident aged 47 and a high share of seniors at 27.8%. This is reflected in its housing, where 52.6% of homes are owned outright. In contrast, Calder is younger, with a typical age of 39 and a much higher share of people in de facto relationships (22.2% compared to 11.0% in Mount Hicks). Calder also has more people working or looking for work, at 70.1% compared to 56.4% in Mount Hicks.
These gaps in age and employment have remained steady or widened over time. Both areas share a few common traits: nobody uses public transport to commute, and no homes are without a motor vehicle. They also have similar rates of volunteering and a similar share of high-income earners. While Mount Hicks has a slightly more qualified workforce, Calder has a higher proportion of residents with no religion (68.4%) compared to the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 375
- First area, 2016: 212
- First area, 2021: 231
- Second area, 2011: 353
- Second area, 2016: 351
- Second area, 2021: 356
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Calder: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Hicks: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Calder: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Hicks: 0.8% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Calder: 1.3% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Calder: 2.1% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Hicks: 3.6% males, 4.4% females
- 65–69 in Calder: 0.0% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Mount Hicks: 5.2% males, 5.8% females
- 60–64 in Calder: 4.7% males, 1.7% females; 60–64 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 6.3% females
- 55–59 in Calder: 3.0% males, 6.0% females; 55–59 in Mount Hicks: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Calder: 6.9% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Calder: 1.7% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Calder: 4.7% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Calder: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Calder: 4.3% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Calder: 2.1% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Calder: 2.1% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Hicks: 1.9% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Calder: 0.0% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 3.6% females
- 10–14 in Calder: 6.4% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 1.6% females
- 5–9 in Calder: 3.9% males, 6.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Hicks: 3.8% males, 1.1% females
- 0–4 in Calder: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Hicks: 4.4% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $453
- First area, 2016: $608
- First area, 2021: $720
- Second area, 2011: $458
- Second area, 2016: $493
- Second area, 2021: $608
- First area, 2011: $991
- First area, 2016: $1,261
- First area, 2021: $1,728
- Second area, 2011: $1,333
- Second area, 2016: $1,147
- Second area, 2021: $1,388
- First area, 2011: $1,339
- First area, 2016: $1,341
- First area, 2021: $1,800
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,364
- Second area, 2021: $1,516
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $173
- First area, 2016: $185
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2011: $168
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $270
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,500
- First area, 2021: $1,289
- Second area, 2011: $1,400
- Second area, 2016: $1,268
- Second area, 2021: $1,408
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Calder with nearby areas
Compare Mount Hicks with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Calder vs Mount Hicks [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60089/calder/vs/SAL60428/mount-hicks