Compare
Mount Hicks vs West Ridgley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Mount Hicks profile · West Ridgley profile
Mount Hicks West Ridgley
Mount Hicks and West Ridgley are nearby Tasmanian areas with distinct profiles. Mount Hicks is a more academic and older community, where 27.8% of residents are aged 65 and over and 18.2% hold a bachelor degree or higher. In contrast, West Ridgley is more geared toward remote work and trades; 26.0% of people work from home, and there is a much higher share of technicians and trades workers. West Ridgley also has a higher proportion of full-time employees at 68.0%, compared to 53.2% in Mount Hicks.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, maintaining a shared set of local characteristics. They are effectively alike in the proportion of children under 15, with both sitting at 17.7%. They also share very similar typical household incomes, which are around $1,340 to $1,390 a week. Across both areas, most residents live in large homes with three or more bedrooms and rely heavily on cars, as neither area has any public transport stops.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 353
- First area, 2016: 351
- First area, 2021: 356
- Second area, 2016: 125
- Second area, 2021: 124
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Hicks: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in West Ridgley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Hicks: 0.8% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in West Ridgley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in West Ridgley: 2.9% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Mount Hicks: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 70–74 in West Ridgley: 7.3% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Mount Hicks: 5.2% males, 5.8% females; 65–69 in West Ridgley: 2.2% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 6.3% females; 60–64 in West Ridgley: 5.1% males, 6.6% females
- 55–59 in Mount Hicks: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in West Ridgley: 10.9% males, 6.6% females
- 50–54 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in West Ridgley: 2.9% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in West Ridgley: 2.9% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in West Ridgley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in West Ridgley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in West Ridgley: 2.9% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in West Ridgley: 3.6% males, 8.8% females
- 20–24 in Mount Hicks: 1.9% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in West Ridgley: 0.0% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in West Ridgley: 4.4% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 1.6% females; 10–14 in West Ridgley: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Mount Hicks: 3.8% males, 1.1% females; 5–9 in West Ridgley: 2.2% males, 4.4% females
- 0–4 in Mount Hicks: 4.4% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in West Ridgley: 4.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $458
- First area, 2016: $493
- First area, 2021: $608
- Second area, 2016: $661
- Second area, 2021: $659
- First area, 2011: $1,333
- First area, 2016: $1,147
- First area, 2021: $1,388
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,339
- First area, 2011: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,364
- First area, 2021: $1,516
- Second area, 2016: $1,781
- Second area, 2021: $1,410
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $168
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $1,400
- First area, 2016: $1,268
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2016: $940
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Hicks with nearby areas
Compare West Ridgley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Hicks vs West Ridgley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60428/mount-hicks/vs/SAL60739/west-ridgley