Compare
Mount Hicks vs Yolla
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.4 km apart · Mount Hicks profile · Yolla profile
Mount Hicks Yolla
Mount Hicks and Yolla are neighbouring rural areas in Tasmania. Mount Hicks has a more established feel, where 52.6% of homes are owned outright and the typical First Nations resident is far older at 49. In contrast, Yolla is more likely to have one-parent families (20.8% compared to 10.2% in Mount Hicks) and people living alone (35.0% vs 16.5%). While Mount Hicks has a higher share of adults with a bachelor degree (18.2%), Yolla is more walkable, with 47.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school.
Both areas are effectively identical in many ways, including their typical weekly household incomes of around $1,300 and the fact that every home is a separate house. These neighbours share the same lack of public transport and are both located over three and a half hours from the city. This shared rural character is consistent across both places, though Yolla has seen more recent growth in its First Nations population, which is now well higher than in Mount Hicks.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 353
- First area, 2016: 351
- First area, 2021: 356
- Second area, 2011: 337
- Second area, 2016: 316
- Second area, 2021: 286
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Hicks: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Yolla: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Hicks: 0.8% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Yolla: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Yolla: 1.7% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Mount Hicks: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 70–74 in Yolla: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Mount Hicks: 5.2% males, 5.8% females; 65–69 in Yolla: 4.8% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 6.3% females; 60–64 in Yolla: 3.8% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Mount Hicks: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Yolla: 6.9% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Yolla: 3.8% males, 6.9% females
- 45–49 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Yolla: 2.4% males, 1.4% females
- 40–44 in Mount Hicks: 2.2% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Yolla: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Yolla: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Yolla: 3.4% males, 1.7% females
- 25–29 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Yolla: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Mount Hicks: 1.9% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Yolla: 1.0% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Mount Hicks: 1.6% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Yolla: 2.8% males, 1.7% females
- 10–14 in Mount Hicks: 2.5% males, 1.6% females; 10–14 in Yolla: 4.1% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Mount Hicks: 3.8% males, 1.1% females; 5–9 in Yolla: 4.5% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Mount Hicks: 4.4% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Yolla: 2.1% males, 3.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $458
- First area, 2016: $493
- First area, 2021: $608
- Second area, 2011: $461
- Second area, 2016: $552
- Second area, 2021: $713
- First area, 2011: $1,333
- First area, 2016: $1,147
- First area, 2021: $1,388
- Second area, 2011: $1,067
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,327
- First area, 2011: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,364
- First area, 2021: $1,516
- Second area, 2011: $1,212
- Second area, 2016: $1,458
- Second area, 2021: $1,662
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $168
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2011: $125
- Second area, 2016: $165
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,400
- First area, 2016: $1,268
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $1,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Hicks with nearby areas
Compare Yolla with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Hicks vs Yolla [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60428/mount-hicks/vs/SAL60772/yolla