Compare
King Leopold Ranges vs Mount Hardman
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 135 km apart · King Leopold Ranges profile · Mount Hardman profile
King Leopold Ranges Mount Hardman
Mount Hardman and King Leopold Ranges are two sparsely populated areas in Western Australia. Mount Hardman has a much larger First Nations population at 91.8% compared to 43.4% in King Leopold Ranges. This is consistent with Mount Hardman having far more children (30.1% versus 14.0%) and a higher share of people using another language at home (85.1% versus 24.5%). Conversely, King Leopold Ranges has a far higher typical weekly family income of $1,399, while Mount Hardman's is $612.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining car-dependent with no homes within walking distance of shops or transport. They share a very low typical weekly rent of $75 and have the same typical age for First Nations residents at 22. While they are alike in these ways, Mount Hardman is far more likely to have rented homes (91.7%) than King Leopold Ranges (43.1%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 263
- First area, 2016: 240
- First area, 2021: 265
- Second area, 2011: 376
- Second area, 2016: 456
- Second area, 2021: 502
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 28 yrs
- First area, 2021: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 23 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 24 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 24 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in King Leopold Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Hardman: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in King Leopold Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Hardman: 0.6% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in King Leopold Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Hardman: 0.0% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in King Leopold Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Hardman: 0.8% males, 0.6% females
- 65–69 in King Leopold Ranges: 1.5% males, 1.1% females; 65–69 in Mount Hardman: 1.4% males, 0.8% females
- 60–64 in King Leopold Ranges: 3.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Hardman: 3.2% males, 1.0% females
- 55–59 in King Leopold Ranges: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Hardman: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 50–54 in King Leopold Ranges: 3.4% males, 2.3% females; 50–54 in Mount Hardman: 1.0% males, 2.2% females
- 45–49 in King Leopold Ranges: 2.3% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Hardman: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
- 40–44 in King Leopold Ranges: 4.5% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Mount Hardman: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 35–39 in King Leopold Ranges: 5.7% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Mount Hardman: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in King Leopold Ranges: 5.7% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Mount Hardman: 4.2% males, 5.1% females
- 25–29 in King Leopold Ranges: 6.4% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Mount Hardman: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 20–24 in King Leopold Ranges: 3.8% males, 4.5% females; 20–24 in Mount Hardman: 4.0% males, 5.7% females
- 15–19 in King Leopold Ranges: 8.7% males, 9.5% females; 15–19 in Mount Hardman: 4.9% males, 5.1% females
- 10–14 in King Leopold Ranges: 1.5% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Mount Hardman: 3.8% males, 4.9% females
- 5–9 in King Leopold Ranges: 1.5% males, 4.2% females; 5–9 in Mount Hardman: 4.3% males, 5.7% females
- 0–4 in King Leopold Ranges: 1.5% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Hardman: 5.7% males, 7.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $625
- First area, 2016: $666
- First area, 2021: $593
- Second area, 2011: $301
- Second area, 2016: $379
- Second area, 2021: $292
- First area, 2011: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,231
- First area, 2021: $1,267
- Second area, 2011: $988
- Second area, 2016: $1,366
- Second area, 2021: $941
- First area, 2011: $833
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $1,399
- Second area, 2011: $700
- Second area, 2016: $1,096
- Second area, 2021: $612
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.9
- Second area, 2016: 4.2
- Second area, 2021: 4.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $30
- First area, 2016: $41
- First area, 2021: $75
- Second area, 2011: $35
- Second area, 2016: $100
- Second area, 2021: $75
- First area, 2011: 1.40
- First area, 2016: 1.40
- First area, 2021: 1.30
- Second area, 2011: 1.50
- Second area, 2016: 1.30
- Second area, 2021: 1.40
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare King Leopold Ranges with nearby areas
Compare Mount Hardman with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). King Leopold Ranges vs Mount Hardman [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50760/king-leopold-ranges/vs/SAL51014/mount-hardman