Compare
Mount Hardman vs St George Ranges
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 86 km apart · Mount Hardman profile · St George Ranges profile
Mount Hardman St George Ranges
St George Ranges and Mount Hardman are both large, sparsely populated areas in Western Australia. St George Ranges has a much higher unemployment rate at 15.0%, compared to 0.0% in Mount Hardman. First Nations unemployment is also far higher in St George Ranges at 20.7%, while it is 0.0% in Mount Hardman. There are more large homes in St George Ranges, where 87.8% of dwellings have three or more bedrooms, compared to 71.6% in Mount Hardman. St George Ranges also has more local services, with 57.7% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while Mount Hardman has none.
Everyday life is very similar in both places, as they share nearly identical proportions of First Nations people and adults with bachelor degrees. Both areas also have very similar typical personal incomes and an almost identical share of people who have served in the Defence Force. While they share these traits, some gaps are shifting; for example, more people have moved into St George Ranges in the last five years than into Mount Hardman.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 376
- First area, 2016: 456
- First area, 2021: 502
- Second area, 2011: 1,080
- Second area, 2016: 1,240
- Second area, 2021: 1,133
- First area, 2011: 23 yrs
- First area, 2016: 24 yrs
- First area, 2021: 24 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 23 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 25 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 25 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Hardman: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in St George Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Hardman: 0.6% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in St George Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Hardman: 0.0% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in St George Ranges: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Mount Hardman: 0.8% males, 0.6% females; 70–74 in St George Ranges: 0.8% males, 0.3% females
- 65–69 in Mount Hardman: 1.4% males, 0.8% females; 65–69 in St George Ranges: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 60–64 in Mount Hardman: 3.2% males, 1.0% females; 60–64 in St George Ranges: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 55–59 in Mount Hardman: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 55–59 in St George Ranges: 1.7% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Mount Hardman: 1.0% males, 2.2% females; 50–54 in St George Ranges: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Mount Hardman: 3.6% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in St George Ranges: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 40–44 in Mount Hardman: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 40–44 in St George Ranges: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Mount Hardman: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in St George Ranges: 3.2% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Hardman: 4.2% males, 5.1% females; 30–34 in St George Ranges: 4.4% males, 4.6% females
- 25–29 in Mount Hardman: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in St George Ranges: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Mount Hardman: 4.0% males, 5.7% females; 20–24 in St George Ranges: 5.2% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Mount Hardman: 4.9% males, 5.1% females; 15–19 in St George Ranges: 4.6% males, 5.7% females
- 10–14 in Mount Hardman: 3.8% males, 4.9% females; 10–14 in St George Ranges: 4.6% males, 5.2% females
- 5–9 in Mount Hardman: 4.3% males, 5.7% females; 5–9 in St George Ranges: 6.2% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Mount Hardman: 5.7% males, 7.5% females; 0–4 in St George Ranges: 5.2% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $301
- First area, 2016: $379
- First area, 2021: $292
- Second area, 2011: $265
- Second area, 2016: $319
- Second area, 2021: $271
- First area, 2011: $988
- First area, 2016: $1,366
- First area, 2021: $941
- Second area, 2011: $723
- Second area, 2016: $845
- Second area, 2021: $730
- First area, 2011: $700
- First area, 2016: $1,096
- First area, 2021: $612
- Second area, 2011: $628
- Second area, 2016: $704
- Second area, 2021: $668
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.9
- First area, 2016: 4.2
- First area, 2021: 4.1
- Second area, 2011: 4.3
- Second area, 2016: 3.8
- Second area, 2021: 3.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $35
- First area, 2016: $100
- First area, 2021: $75
- Second area, 2011: $30
- Second area, 2016: $75
- Second area, 2021: $70
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.50
- First area, 2016: 1.30
- First area, 2021: 1.40
- Second area, 2011: 1.50
- Second area, 2016: 1.20
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Hardman with nearby areas
Compare St George Ranges with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Hardman vs St George Ranges [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51014/mount-hardman/vs/SAL51401/st-george-ranges