Compare
Echunga vs Mount Barker
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.0 km apart · Echunga profile · Mount Barker profile
Echunga Mount Barker
Mount Barker (SA) and Echunga are neighbouring South Australian areas with very different characters. Mount Barker (SA) is a larger, more active hub where 51.5% of people moved in during the last five years; it is somewhat walkable, with 54.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Echunga is car-dependent, with 0.0% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, and it has a more settled population where 36.0% of homes are owned outright compared to 23.4% in Mount Barker (SA).
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of children under 15, with Mount Barker (SA) at 19.8% and Echunga at 18.9%. They also share similar unemployment rates, around 3.7% and 3.9%. However, the two places differ in their transport and housing setups. Mount Barker (SA) has far more weekly public transport departures and a higher rental rate, while Echunga has far more public transport stops per 1,000 people, though it takes much longer to walk to the nearest one.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,050
- First area, 2016: 1,109
- First area, 2021: 1,219
- Second area, 2011: 11,809
- Second area, 2016: 13,842
- Second area, 2021: 18,330
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Echunga: 0.2% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Barker: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Echunga: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Mount Barker: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Mount Barker: 1.4% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Echunga: 3.7% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Mount Barker: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Mount Barker: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Mount Barker: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Mount Barker: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Echunga: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Mount Barker: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Barker: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Mount Barker: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Echunga: 3.8% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Mount Barker: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Mount Barker: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Barker: 3.8% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Mount Barker: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Mount Barker: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Mount Barker: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Barker: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Mount Barker: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $628
- First area, 2016: $744
- First area, 2021: $887
- Second area, 2011: $568
- Second area, 2016: $642
- Second area, 2021: $815
- First area, 2011: $1,391
- First area, 2016: $1,719
- First area, 2021: $2,090
- Second area, 2011: $1,102
- Second area, 2016: $1,296
- Second area, 2021: $1,624
- First area, 2011: $1,732
- First area, 2016: $1,963
- First area, 2021: $2,322
- Second area, 2011: $1,381
- Second area, 2016: $1,612
- Second area, 2021: $2,038
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $254
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $310
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,761
- Second area, 2011: $1,625
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Echunga with nearby areas
Compare Mount Barker with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Echunga vs Mount Barker [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40388/echunga/vs/SAL40932/mount-barker