Compare
Echunga vs Totness
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.7 km apart · Echunga profile · Totness profile
Echunga Totness
Echunga and Totness are neighbouring areas in South Australia, though they differ in scale and makeup. Echunga is a larger residential area where typical weekly rents are far higher at $320, compared to $190 in Totness. Totness is sparsely populated and has a very different housing profile, with a far higher share of people living alone (35.3% versus 16.1% in Echunga) and more homes owned outright. Families are more common in Echunga, where more people are in de facto relationships and more households have children to care for.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people born overseas. This commonality exists alongside a stark contrast in infrastructure; Totness has far more public transport departures and a much higher number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents. Meanwhile, Echunga is far more convenient for those without a car to reach a park or school. Over time, the gap in typical weekly income has remained significant, with Totness continuing to be well higher at $3,312 compared to $2,322 in Echunga.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,050
- First area, 2016: 1,109
- First area, 2021: 1,219
- Second area, 2016: 93
- Second area, 2021: 96
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Echunga: 0.2% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Totness: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Echunga: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Totness: 0.0% males, 5.6% females
- 75–79 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Totness: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Echunga: 3.7% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Totness: 3.4% males, 5.6% females
- 65–69 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Totness: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Totness: 4.5% males, 5.6% females
- 55–59 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Totness: 6.7% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Echunga: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Totness: 0.0% males, 5.6% females
- 45–49 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Totness: 6.7% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Totness: 0.0% males, 6.7% females
- 35–39 in Echunga: 3.8% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Totness: 0.0% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Totness: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Totness: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Totness: 4.5% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Totness: 4.5% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Totness: 3.4% males, 5.6% females
- 5–9 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Totness: 3.4% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Totness: 0.0% males, 4.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $628
- First area, 2016: $744
- First area, 2021: $887
- Second area, 2016: $782
- Second area, 2021: $1,015
- First area, 2011: $1,391
- First area, 2016: $1,719
- First area, 2021: $2,090
- Second area, 2016: $1,458
- Second area, 2021: $2,374
- First area, 2011: $1,732
- First area, 2016: $1,963
- First area, 2021: $2,322
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $3,312
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $254
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2016: $290
- Second area, 2021: $190
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,761
- Second area, 2016: $2,046
- Second area, 2021: $2,100
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Echunga with nearby areas
Compare Totness with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Echunga vs Totness [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40388/echunga/vs/SAL41469/totness