Compare
Littlehampton vs Mount Barker
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.9 km apart · Littlehampton profile · Mount Barker profile
Littlehampton Mount Barker
Mount Barker (SA) and Littlehampton are neighbouring areas with very different housing and transport profiles. Mount Barker (SA) is a more transient place, with 51.5% of people moving in during the last five years, and it has a far higher share of renters at 29.3%. In contrast, Littlehampton is more stable, with 34.2% of homes owned outright compared to 23.4% in Mount Barker (SA). Mount Barker (SA) also has far more public transport departures and better street connectivity, though Littlehampton has a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (79.2%) and health services (76.8%).
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to their unemployment rates, which sit at 3.7% and 3.3%. They also share very similar proportions of people aged 65 and over and a nearly equal share of residents who identify as having no religion. While Littlehampton has a slightly older typical resident at 40 compared to 36 in Mount Barker (SA), both areas track closely to the national figure for the typical age of residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,748
- First area, 2016: 3,044
- First area, 2021: 3,300
- Second area, 2011: 11,809
- Second area, 2016: 13,842
- Second area, 2021: 18,330
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Littlehampton: 0.7% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Mount Barker: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Littlehampton: 0.7% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Mount Barker: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Littlehampton: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Mount Barker: 1.4% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Littlehampton: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Barker: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Littlehampton: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Mount Barker: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Littlehampton: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Mount Barker: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Littlehampton: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Mount Barker: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Littlehampton: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Barker: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Littlehampton: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Barker: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Littlehampton: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Mount Barker: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Littlehampton: 2.7% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Mount Barker: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Littlehampton: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Barker: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Littlehampton: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Barker: 3.8% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Littlehampton: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Mount Barker: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Littlehampton: 3.7% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Mount Barker: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Littlehampton: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Mount Barker: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Littlehampton: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Mount Barker: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Littlehampton: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Mount Barker: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $659
- First area, 2016: $739
- First area, 2021: $886
- Second area, 2011: $568
- Second area, 2016: $642
- Second area, 2021: $815
- First area, 2011: $1,545
- First area, 2016: $1,741
- First area, 2021: $2,086
- Second area, 2011: $1,102
- Second area, 2016: $1,296
- Second area, 2021: $1,624
- First area, 2011: $1,735
- First area, 2016: $1,986
- First area, 2021: $2,283
- Second area, 2011: $1,381
- Second area, 2016: $1,612
- Second area, 2021: $2,038
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $290
- First area, 2016: $330
- First area, 2021: $360
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $310
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,683
- First area, 2016: $1,647
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,625
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Littlehampton with nearby areas
Compare Mount Barker with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Littlehampton vs Mount Barker [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40770/littlehampton/vs/SAL40932/mount-barker