Compare
Echunga vs Flaxley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.0 km apart · Echunga profile · Flaxley profile
Echunga Flaxley
Echunga and Flaxley are neighbouring areas in South Australia with very different levels of accessibility. Echunga is a larger hub where typical weekly household incomes are well higher at $2,090, compared to $1,562 in Flaxley. It is far more connected, with 55.3% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport and 47.3% within 15 minutes of a school, while Flaxley has 0.0% for both. In contrast, Flaxley has a noticeably older population, with a typical age of 48 compared to 41 in Echunga, and a higher share of people working from home at 24.7%.
Both areas share a similar domestic life, with the same typical number of people per home at 2.7. They also have almost identical rates of volunteering and people providing unpaid care. While Echunga has more children and higher typical incomes, Flaxley has a higher share of residents born overseas (15.8% versus 10.6%) and a larger proportion of adults with a bachelor degree or higher. Both areas sit well above the national figure for university qualifications.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,050
- First area, 2016: 1,109
- First area, 2021: 1,219
- Second area, 2011: 303
- Second area, 2016: 173
- Second area, 2021: 177
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Echunga: 0.2% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Flaxley: 0.0% males, 3.0% females
- 80–84 in Echunga: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Flaxley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Flaxley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Echunga: 3.7% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Flaxley: 6.7% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Flaxley: 3.0% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Flaxley: 1.8% males, 7.9% females
- 55–59 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Flaxley: 4.9% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Echunga: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Flaxley: 1.8% males, 6.1% females
- 45–49 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Flaxley: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Flaxley: 1.8% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Echunga: 3.8% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Flaxley: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Flaxley: 1.8% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Flaxley: 0.0% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Flaxley: 4.9% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Flaxley: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Flaxley: 0.0% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Flaxley: 4.9% males, 1.8% females
- 0–4 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Flaxley: 2.4% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $628
- First area, 2016: $744
- First area, 2021: $887
- Second area, 2011: $603
- Second area, 2016: $565
- Second area, 2021: $712
- First area, 2011: $1,391
- First area, 2016: $1,719
- First area, 2021: $2,090
- Second area, 2011: $1,268
- Second area, 2016: $1,478
- Second area, 2021: $1,562
- First area, 2011: $1,732
- First area, 2016: $1,963
- First area, 2021: $2,322
- Second area, 2011: $1,401
- Second area, 2016: $1,416
- Second area, 2021: $2,041
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $254
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $125
- Second area, 2016: $235
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,761
- Second area, 2011: $2,100
- Second area, 2016: $2,026
- Second area, 2021: $2,030
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Echunga with nearby areas
Compare Flaxley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Echunga vs Flaxley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40388/echunga/vs/SAL40445/flaxley