Compare
Echunga vs Macclesfield
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.4 km apart · Echunga profile · Macclesfield profile
Echunga Macclesfield
Macclesfield (SA) and Echunga are neighbouring rural areas with similar populations, but they differ in their local services and demographics. Echunga has a more accessible layout, with far more public transport stops and a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park. The typical household in Echunga also earns more, with a typical weekly income of $2,090 compared to $1,605 in Macclesfield (SA). Meanwhile, Macclesfield (SA) has a notably older population, with a typical resident aged 47, and far more people who identify as having no religion (62.2% against 50.7% in Echunga).
Both areas share almost identical rates of people using another language at home, at 2.5%. They are also alike in their housing patterns, such as the typical weekly rent and the number of people per bedroom. However, some gaps are widening; the difference in typical weekly household income is now well higher in Echunga, and the gap in public transport access has grown significantly over time.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,050
- First area, 2016: 1,109
- First area, 2021: 1,219
- Second area, 2011: 1,238
- Second area, 2016: 1,352
- Second area, 2021: 1,413
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Echunga: 0.2% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Macclesfield: 0.3% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Echunga: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Macclesfield: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Macclesfield: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Echunga: 3.7% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Macclesfield: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Macclesfield: 4.1% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Macclesfield: 3.5% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Macclesfield: 4.3% males, 5.2% females
- 50–54 in Echunga: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Macclesfield: 3.2% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Macclesfield: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Macclesfield: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Echunga: 3.8% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Macclesfield: 2.9% males, 2.0% females
- 30–34 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Macclesfield: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Echunga: 1.8% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Macclesfield: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Echunga: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Macclesfield: 3.1% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Echunga: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Macclesfield: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Echunga: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Macclesfield: 3.4% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Echunga: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Macclesfield: 2.6% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Echunga: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Macclesfield: 1.9% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $628
- First area, 2016: $744
- First area, 2021: $887
- Second area, 2011: $556
- Second area, 2016: $671
- Second area, 2021: $791
- First area, 2011: $1,391
- First area, 2016: $1,719
- First area, 2021: $2,090
- Second area, 2011: $1,175
- Second area, 2016: $1,410
- Second area, 2021: $1,605
- First area, 2011: $1,732
- First area, 2016: $1,963
- First area, 2021: $2,322
- Second area, 2011: $1,371
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $2,037
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $254
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $263
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $308
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,761
- Second area, 2011: $1,400
- Second area, 2016: $1,473
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Echunga with nearby areas
Compare Macclesfield with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Echunga vs Macclesfield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40388/echunga/vs/SAL40799/macclesfield