Compare
Fig Tree Pocket vs Kenmore Hills
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.6 km apart · Fig Tree Pocket profile · Kenmore Hills profile
Fig Tree Pocket Kenmore Hills
Fig Tree Pocket and Kenmore Hills are neighbouring residential areas with distinct age and income profiles. Fig Tree Pocket is more family-oriented and affluent, with a typical resident aged 40 and a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (56.3%). In contrast, Kenmore Hills is noticeably older, with the typical resident aged 47 and seniors making up 26.1% of the population. Fig Tree Pocket also has more separate houses (99.4%) and better access to schools, while Kenmore Hills has more homes within a 15-minute walk of health services (50.0%) and groceries (32.7%).
Daily life in both areas is very similar in many ways, with nearly identical shares of people who volunteer, those in de facto relationships, and a similar typical weekly rent of around $590. Both areas are far above the national figure for typical incomes and higher education. While Fig Tree Pocket has more street connectivity and walkable amenities, the gap in health service access remains far higher in Kenmore Hills.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,652
- First area, 2016: 4,045
- First area, 2021: 4,345
- Second area, 2011: 2,577
- Second area, 2016: 2,402
- Second area, 2021: 2,448
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Kenmore Hills: 1.5% males, 2.8% females
- 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Kenmore Hills: 1.5% males, 2.6% females
- 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Kenmore Hills: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Kenmore Hills: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Kenmore Hills: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Kenmore Hills: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Kenmore Hills: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Kenmore Hills: 3.6% males, 4.3% females
- 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Kenmore Hills: 4.3% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Kenmore Hills: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Kenmore Hills: 2.0% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Kenmore Hills: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Kenmore Hills: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Kenmore Hills: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Kenmore Hills: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Kenmore Hills: 5.5% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Kenmore Hills: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Kenmore Hills: 1.4% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $1,005
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $711
- Second area, 2016: $784
- Second area, 2021: $898
- First area, 2011: $2,710
- First area, 2016: $3,038
- First area, 2021: $3,791
- Second area, 2011: $2,402
- Second area, 2016: $2,402
- Second area, 2021: $2,712
- First area, 2011: $2,797
- First area, 2016: $3,313
- First area, 2021: $4,226
- Second area, 2011: $2,663
- Second area, 2016: $2,658
- Second area, 2021: $3,145
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $465
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $438
- Second area, 2016: $505
- Second area, 2021: $598
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,815
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,507
- Second area, 2016: $2,383
- Second area, 2021: $2,694
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas
Compare Kenmore Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fig Tree Pocket vs Kenmore Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31037/fig-tree-pocket/vs/SAL31505/kenmore-hills