Compare
Fig Tree Pocket vs Graceville
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Fig Tree Pocket profile · Graceville profile
Fig Tree Pocket Graceville
Graceville and Fig Tree Pocket are neighbouring areas in Brisbane that offer very different lifestyles. Graceville is very walkable, with 99.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 96.1% near health services. In contrast, Fig Tree Pocket is mostly car-dependent, where only 5.6% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries. Fig Tree Pocket is also more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $3,791 compared to $2,929 in Graceville, and has a higher share of detached houses at 99.4% versus 88.4% in Graceville.
Both areas share a similar family profile, with around 23% of their populations being children under 15. They also have very similar typical personal weekly incomes of about $1,200. Despite these similarities, Fig Tree Pocket has a much higher share of people born overseas (33.5% compared to 24.6%) and a significantly higher proportion of people who speak a First Nations language (8.3% versus 0.0%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,652
- First area, 2016: 4,045
- First area, 2021: 4,345
- Second area, 2011: 4,213
- Second area, 2016: 4,634
- Second area, 2021: 4,764
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Graceville: 0.8% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Graceville: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Graceville: 0.9% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Graceville: 1.6% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Graceville: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Graceville: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Graceville: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Graceville: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Graceville: 4.4% males, 4.8% females
- 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Graceville: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Graceville: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Graceville: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Graceville: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Graceville: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Graceville: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Graceville: 5.0% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Graceville: 4.3% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Graceville: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $1,005
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $846
- Second area, 2016: $942
- Second area, 2021: $1,195
- First area, 2011: $2,710
- First area, 2016: $3,038
- First area, 2021: $3,791
- Second area, 2011: $2,136
- Second area, 2016: $2,397
- Second area, 2021: $2,929
- First area, 2011: $2,797
- First area, 2016: $3,313
- First area, 2021: $4,226
- Second area, 2011: $2,550
- Second area, 2016: $2,814
- Second area, 2021: $3,574
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $465
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $400
- Second area, 2016: $465
- Second area, 2021: $495
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,815
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,300
- Second area, 2016: $2,383
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas
Compare Graceville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fig Tree Pocket vs Graceville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31037/fig-tree-pocket/vs/SAL31220/graceville