Compare
Chelmer vs Fig Tree Pocket
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Chelmer profile · Fig Tree Pocket profile
Chelmer Fig Tree Pocket
Fig Tree Pocket and Chelmer are neighbouring areas with very different layouts. Chelmer is very walkable, with 72.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 72.8% near health services. In contrast, Fig Tree Pocket is mostly car-dependent, where only 5.6% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries. Fig Tree Pocket is also more diverse, with a well higher share of people born overseas (33.5%) and those using another language at home (17.0%) compared to Chelmer (25.2% and 12.7%).
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, as they have almost identical shares of children under 15, one-parent families, and people with no religion. They also have very similar typical weekly personal incomes. However, the two areas differ in their transit options; while everyone in Fig Tree Pocket uses the bus for public transport, over half of Chelmer residents use the train. These two areas also have similar rates of home ownership, though Fig Tree Pocket has a well higher share of homes with three or more bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,594
- First area, 2016: 2,998
- First area, 2021: 3,325
- Second area, 2011: 3,652
- Second area, 2016: 4,045
- Second area, 2021: 4,345
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chelmer: 0.9% males, 2.3% females; 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Chelmer: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Chelmer: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Chelmer: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Chelmer: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Chelmer: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Chelmer: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Chelmer: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Chelmer: 4.3% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females
- 40–44 in Chelmer: 3.4% males, 4.4% females; 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females
- 35–39 in Chelmer: 2.6% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Chelmer: 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Chelmer: 1.4% males, 1.1% females; 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 20–24 in Chelmer: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Chelmer: 4.6% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females
- 10–14 in Chelmer: 5.2% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Chelmer: 4.3% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Chelmer: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $844
- First area, 2016: $974
- First area, 2021: $1,282
- Second area, 2011: $863
- Second area, 2016: $1,005
- Second area, 2021: $1,205
- First area, 2011: $2,384
- First area, 2016: $2,550
- First area, 2021: $3,402
- Second area, 2011: $2,710
- Second area, 2016: $3,038
- Second area, 2021: $3,791
- First area, 2011: $2,698
- First area, 2016: $3,064
- First area, 2021: $3,900
- Second area, 2011: $2,797
- Second area, 2016: $3,313
- Second area, 2021: $4,226
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $330
- First area, 2016: $460
- First area, 2021: $490
- Second area, 2011: $465
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $590
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,600
- Second area, 2016: $2,815
- Second area, 2021: $3,033
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Chelmer with nearby areas
Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chelmer vs Fig Tree Pocket [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30588/chelmer/vs/SAL31037/fig-tree-pocket