Compare

Fig Tree Pocket vs Kenmore

Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.7 km apart · Fig Tree Pocket profile · Kenmore profile

Fig Tree Pocket Kenmore

Kenmore and Fig Tree Pocket are neighbouring areas in Brisbane with very different levels of convenience. Kenmore is very walkable, with 73.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of local amenities and far more public transport departures per 1,000 people. Fig Tree Pocket is mostly car-dependent, as only 0.6% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed. Income is significantly higher in Fig Tree Pocket, where the typical household earns $3,791 a week, compared to $2,491 in Kenmore.

Both areas have a similar age profile, with the typical resident in each being 40, which is close to the national figure. They also share a similar proportion of children under 15 and a nearly identical percentage of people born overseas. While they are alike in these ways, the gaps in their walkability and income levels remain distinct across the two neighbourhoods.

Where they differ most

Demographics & Identity

Population in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +5,330 larger in Kenmore gap steady
4,345 86th pct 9,675 87th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3,652
  • First area, 2016: 4,045
  • First area, 2021: 4,345
  • Second area, 2011: 8,483
  • Second area, 2016: 8,960
  • Second area, 2021: 9,675
Median age in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore even gap steady
40 yrs 29th pct 40 yrs 29th pct
  • First area, 2011: 39 yrs
  • First area, 2016: 40 yrs
  • First area, 2021: 40 yrs
  • Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
  • Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
  • Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
First Nations in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.2 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
0.8% 38th pct 0.7% 36th pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.2%
  • First area, 2016: 0.1%
  • First area, 2021: 0.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 0.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.7%
Aged 65+ in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +4.0 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
12.8% 25th pct 16.8% 41st pct
  • First area, 2011: 10.4%
  • First area, 2016: 12.2%
  • First area, 2021: 12.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 17.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 17.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 16.8%
Under 15 in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.7 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
22.8% 83rd pct 22.0% 79th pct
  • First area, 2011: 24.5%
  • First area, 2016: 23.8%
  • First area, 2021: 22.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 20.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 21.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 22.0%
De facto in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.3 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
5.8% 13th pct 8.1% 22nd pct
  • First area, 2011: 4.0%
  • First area, 2016: 6.2%
  • First area, 2021: 5.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 6.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 8.1%

Age structure

29.5% Older adults (45–64) ◂ +3.9 pts 25.7%
20.0% Young adults (25–44) +3.1 pts ▸ 23.1%
22.8% Children (0–14) ◂ +0.7 pts 22.0%
12.8% Seniors (65+) +4.0 pts ▸ 16.8%
14.9% Youth (15–24) ◂ +2.6 pts 12.3%

Marital status

61.4% Married ◂ +5.0 pts 56.4%
28.4% Never married +0.5 pts ▸ 28.9%
6.0% Divorced +1.8 pts ▸ 7.8%
2.4% Widowed +2.1 pts ▸ 4.5%
1.7% Separated +0.7 pts ▸ 2.4%

Age & sex structure

Fig Tree Pocket Kenmore

Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.

  • 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Kenmore: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
  • 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Kenmore: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
  • 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Kenmore: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
  • 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Kenmore: 1.7% males, 2.1% females
  • 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Kenmore: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
  • 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Kenmore: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
  • 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Kenmore: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
  • 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Kenmore: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
  • 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Kenmore: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
  • 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Kenmore: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
  • 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Kenmore: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
  • 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Kenmore: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
  • 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Kenmore: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
  • 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Kenmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
  • 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Kenmore: 3.9% males, 3.2% females
  • 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Kenmore: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
  • 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Kenmore: 4.0% males, 4.1% females
  • 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Kenmore: 3.1% males, 2.8% females

Ancestry & Birthplace

Born overseas in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.4 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
33.5% 91st pct 33.1% 91st pct
  • First area, 2011: 28.3%
  • First area, 2016: 30.2%
  • First area, 2021: 33.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 30.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 32.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 33.1%

Country of birth

64.7% Australia +0.4 pts ▸ 65.2%
6.0% England ◂ +0.7 pts 5.2%
4.3% South Africa ◂ +0.6 pts 3.7%
2.4% China +0.5 pts ▸ 2.9%
2.8% India ◂ +0.8 pts 2.0%
2.5% New Zealand ◂ +0.1 pts 2.4%
0.5% Philippines +0.1 pts ▸ 0.6%
0.5% Vietnam ◂ +0.1 pts 0.4%
0.2% Italy even 0.2%
0.0% Nepal +0.1 pts ▸ 0.1%

Ancestry

39.5% English even 39.5%
28.8% Australian +0.3 pts ▸ 29.1%
12.9% Irish +1.4 pts ▸ 14.3%
12.2% Scottish even 12.2%
6.2% Chinese +1.0 pts ▸ 7.2%
6.4% German ◂ +0.6 pts 5.7%
5.0% Indian ◂ +1.7 pts 3.3%
2.7% Italian ◂ +0.2 pts 2.5%
1.5% Dutch +0.3 pts ▸ 1.8%
1.0% Vietnamese ◂ +0.4 pts 0.6%
0.6% Filipino +0.2 pts ▸ 0.8%
0.7% Greek ◂ +0.1 pts 0.6%

Language

Other language in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.0 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
17.0% 86th pct 19.0% 87th pct
  • First area, 2011: 9.4%
  • First area, 2016: 12.3%
  • First area, 2021: 17.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 13.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 16.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 19.0%
Limited English in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.4 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
1.3% 79th pct 1.7% 83rd pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.7%
  • First area, 2021: 1.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 1.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 1.7%

Language used at home

81.1% English only ◂ +2.0 pts 79.1%
3.3% Mandarin +0.8 pts ▸ 4.1%
1.2% Hindi ◂ +0.5 pts 0.6%
0.7% Cantonese +0.2 pts ▸ 1.0%
0.6% Vietnamese ◂ +0.2 pts 0.4%
0.3% Italian ◂ +0.1 pts 0.2%
0.2% Punjabi even 0.2%
0.1% Tagalog +0.1 pts ▸ 0.2%
0.2% Arabic even 0.1%
0.1% Greek even 0.1%

Religion

No religion in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.9 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
41.2% 52nd pct 44.1% 61st pct
  • First area, 2011: 22.8%
  • First area, 2016: 31.9%
  • First area, 2021: 41.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 26.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 35.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 44.1%

Religious affiliation

47.9% Christianity ◂ +2.3 pts 45.5%
41.2% No religion +2.9 pts ▸ 44.1%
4.4% Hinduism ◂ +1.6 pts 2.7%
3.5% Not stated +0.5 pts ▸ 3.9%
1.5% Buddhism +0.4 pts ▸ 1.8%
1.1% Islam ◂ +0.1 pts 1.0%
0.4% Other religions +0.1 pts ▸ 0.6%
0.3% Judaism even 0.3%

Education & Qualifications

Year 12 in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.7 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
86.3% 100th pct 83.5% 100th pct
  • First area, 2011: 78.3%
  • First area, 2016: 80.8%
  • First area, 2021: 86.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 76.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 79.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 83.5%
Bachelor+ in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +3.6 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
53.5% 100th pct 49.9% 99th pct
  • First area, 2011: 43.6%
  • First area, 2016: 47.7%
  • First area, 2021: 53.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 40.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 44.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 49.9%
Schools/1k kids in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.16 more in Fig Tree Pocket
3.03 43rd pct 1.88 26th pct
Schools ≤3 km in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +5 more in Fig Tree Pocket
27 88th pct 22 87th pct
Avg size in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +236 larger in Fig Tree Pocket
853 98th pct 617 86th pct
ICSEA in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +3 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
1,124 96th pct 1,121 96th pct

Highest year of school

86.3% Year 12 ◂ +2.7 pts 83.5%
6.6% Year 10 +1.5 pts ▸ 8.1%
3.0% Year 11 +0.5 pts ▸ 3.5%
1.7% Year 9 or below +0.5 pts ▸ 2.3%

Highest qualification level

43.0% Bachelor degree ◂ +3.6 pts 39.4%
23.4% Postgraduate degree ◂ +2.5 pts 20.9%
12.4% Advanced diploma / diploma +1.6 pts ▸ 14.1%
8.2% Certificate III / IV +3.4 pts ▸ 11.6%
5.3% Graduate diploma / certificate +0.7 pts ▸ 6.0%
1.0% Certificate I / II ◂ +0.1 pts 1.0%

Field of qualification

24.6% Management & commerce ◂ +2.7 pts 21.9%
16.9% Health ◂ +5.3 pts 11.6%
12.9% Society & culture +1.4 pts ▸ 14.3%
11.3% Engineering & related +0.9 pts ▸ 12.2%
7.9% Education +1.8 pts ▸ 9.6%
5.9% Natural & physical sciences +0.4 pts ▸ 6.3%
3.8% Creative arts +1.6 pts ▸ 5.4%
4.2% Information technology +0.4 pts ▸ 4.6%
3.8% Architecture & building +0.4 pts ▸ 4.3%
2.1% Food, hospitality & personal services +0.7 pts ▸ 2.8%
1.3% Agriculture & environment +0.3 pts ▸ 1.6%

Income

Personal income in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$171 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$1,205 90th pct $1,034 85th pct
  • First area, 2011: $863
  • First area, 2016: $1,005
  • First area, 2021: $1,205
  • Second area, 2011: $758
  • Second area, 2016: $833
  • Second area, 2021: $1,034
Household income in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$1,300 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$3,791 100th pct $2,491 89th pct
  • First area, 2011: $2,710
  • First area, 2016: $3,038
  • First area, 2021: $3,791
  • Second area, 2011: $1,916
  • Second area, 2016: $2,046
  • Second area, 2021: $2,491
Family income in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$1,305 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$4,226 100th pct $2,921 90th pct
  • First area, 2011: $2,797
  • First area, 2016: $3,313
  • First area, 2021: $4,226
  • Second area, 2011: $2,196
  • Second area, 2016: $2,328
  • Second area, 2021: $2,921
High earners in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +8.9 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
31.9% 100th pct 23.0% 92nd pct
  • First area, 2011: 21.8%
  • First area, 2016: 25.1%
  • First area, 2021: 31.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 12.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 23.0%
High-income homes in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +16.8 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
56.3% 100th pct 39.6% 93rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 33.3%
  • First area, 2016: 44.3%
  • First area, 2021: 56.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 20.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 26.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 39.6%

Household income distribution

45.3% $4,000 or more ◂ +20.8 pts 24.5%
19.8% $1,500–$2,999 +7.7 pts ▸ 27.4%
12.6% $650–$1,499 +5.2 pts ▸ 17.8%
11.0% $3,000–$3,999 +4.0 pts ▸ 15.0%
6.1% Under $650 +3.3 pts ▸ 9.4%

Personal income distribution

33.4% Under $650 +2.1 pts ▸ 35.5%
21.6% $650–$1,499 +4.6 pts ▸ 26.2%
22.1% $1,500–$2,999 +3.6 pts ▸ 25.7%
20.1% $3,000 or more ◂ +10.2 pts 9.9%

Health & Disability

Health condition in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +4.8 pts higher in Kenmore
21.7% 19th pct 26.5% 38th pct
Mental health in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.3 pts higher in Kenmore
6.0% 30th pct 8.3% 52nd pct
Needs assistance in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.1 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
3.0% 32nd pct 4.1% 43rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 2.8%
  • First area, 2016: 3.1%
  • First area, 2021: 3.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 3.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.1%

Long-term health conditions reported

6.0% Mental health +2.3 pts ▸ 8.3%
7.1% Other condition +1.1 pts ▸ 8.2%
7.0% Asthma +1.1 pts ▸ 8.1%
5.8% Arthritis +0.9 pts ▸ 6.7%
3.2% Heart disease +0.5 pts ▸ 3.6%
2.2% Diabetes +1.0 pts ▸ 3.2%
2.7% Cancer +0.4 pts ▸ 3.1%
0.9% Lung condition +0.4 pts ▸ 1.3%
0.4% Stroke +0.3 pts ▸ 0.7%
0.4% Dementia even 0.4%

Number of long-term health conditions

74.0% None ◂ +4.7 pts 69.4%
16.6% One condition +3.1 pts ▸ 19.6%
3.8% Two conditions +1.2 pts ▸ 5.0%
1.5% Three or more +0.4 pts ▸ 1.8%

Community Participation

Volunteering in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.1 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
22.9% 70th pct 21.7% 66th pct
  • First area, 2011: 28.7%
  • First area, 2016: 27.8%
  • First area, 2021: 22.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 27.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 28.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 21.7%
Unpaid carers in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.8 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
12.3% 45th pct 13.2% 54th pct
  • First area, 2011: 11.4%
  • First area, 2016: 11.2%
  • First area, 2021: 12.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 10.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 11.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 13.2%
Unpaid child care in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore even gap narrowing
36.4% 89th pct 36.4% 89th pct
  • First area, 2011: 37.0%
  • First area, 2016: 38.1%
  • First area, 2021: 36.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 32.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 33.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 36.4%
Defence service in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore even
3.7% 67th pct 3.7% 67th pct
Housework 15h+ in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.5 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
25.7% 59th pct 26.2% 62nd pct
  • First area, 2011: 27.2%
  • First area, 2016: 25.2%
  • First area, 2021: 25.7%
  • Second area, 2011: 25.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 26.2%

First Nations

First Nations people in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +29 larger in Kenmore
36 74th pct 65 80th pct
Median age in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +12 yrs older in Kenmore
14 yrs 10th pct 26 yrs 50th pct
— 86.4% 100th pct
— 7.9% 38th pct
Median income in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$855 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
$1,624 91st pct $769 62nd pct
Household income in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$125 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
$3,250 89th pct $3,125 88th pct
Indigenous language in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +8.3 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket
8.3% 72nd pct 0.0% 0th pct

Family & Households

Household size in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.4 larger in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
3.2 89th pct 2.8 76th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.2
  • First area, 2016: 3.1
  • First area, 2021: 3.2
  • Second area, 2011: 2.8
  • Second area, 2016: 2.8
  • Second area, 2021: 2.8
One-parent in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +3.8 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
7.6% 30th pct 11.4% 54th pct
  • First area, 2011: 7.8%
  • First area, 2016: 8.1%
  • First area, 2021: 7.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 11.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 11.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 11.4%
Living alone in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +7.6 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
9.4% 6th pct 17.0% 26th pct
  • First area, 2011: 9.7%
  • First area, 2016: 10.3%
  • First area, 2021: 9.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 17.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 17.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 17.0%

Family composition

75.3% Couples with children ◂ +8.2 pts 67.1%
16.9% Couples without children +3.7 pts ▸ 20.5%
7.6% One-parent families +3.8 pts ▸ 11.4%
0.4% Other families +0.6 pts ▸ 1.0%

Household size

27.7% 2 people +2.6 pts ▸ 30.3%
29.7% 4 people ◂ +5.6 pts 24.1%
18.7% 3 people ◂ +0.5 pts 18.2%
9.4% 1 person +7.6 pts ▸ 17.0%
11.5% 5 people ◂ +3.4 pts 8.1%
2.9% 6 or more ◂ +0.4 pts 2.5%

Housing & Dwellings

Rent in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$77 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$590 99th pct $513 93rd pct
  • First area, 2011: $465
  • First area, 2016: $540
  • First area, 2021: $590
  • Second area, 2011: $415
  • Second area, 2016: $460
  • Second area, 2021: $513
Mortgage in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +$833 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$3,033 92nd pct $2,200 81st pct
  • First area, 2011: $2,600
  • First area, 2016: $2,815
  • First area, 2021: $3,033
  • Second area, 2011: $2,100
  • Second area, 2016: $2,167
  • Second area, 2021: $2,200
People / bedroom in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.10 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
0.80 43rd pct 0.70 14th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.00
  • First area, 2016: 0.80
  • First area, 2021: 0.80
  • Second area, 2011: 1.00
  • Second area, 2016: 0.80
  • Second area, 2021: 0.70
Renting in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +3.8 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
13.2% 38th pct 17.0% 51st pct
  • First area, 2011: 12.3%
  • First area, 2016: 12.5%
  • First area, 2021: 13.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 17.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 16.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 17.0%
Owned outright in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +6.0 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
41.8% 52nd pct 35.8% 35th pct
  • First area, 2011: 43.0%
  • First area, 2016: 42.8%
  • First area, 2021: 41.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 40.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 38.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 35.8%
Separate houses in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +7.3 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
99.4% 67th pct 92.2% 37th pct
  • First area, 2011: 98.9%
  • First area, 2016: 100.0%
  • First area, 2021: 99.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 87.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 94.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 92.2%
3+ bedrooms in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.2 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
97.9% 96th pct 95.6% 91st pct
  • First area, 2011: 96.0%
  • First area, 2016: 98.0%
  • First area, 2021: 97.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 95.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 94.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 95.6%

How homes are owned or rented

43.8% Owned with a mortgage +1.8 pts ▸ 45.6%
41.8% Owned outright ◂ +6.0 pts 35.8%
13.2% Rented +3.8 pts ▸ 17.0%
0.4% Other tenure +0.4 pts ▸ 0.8%
0.4% Not stated +0.2 pts ▸ 0.7%

Types of homes

99.4% Separate house ◂ +7.3 pts 92.2%
0.0% Townhouse / semi-detached +6.6 pts ▸ 6.6%
0.6% Flat or apartment +0.8 pts ▸ 1.4%
0.0% Other dwelling even 0.0%

Bedrooms per home

44.9% 4 bedrooms ◂ +1.5 pts 43.4%
20.9% 3 bedrooms +16.6 pts ▸ 37.5%
32.0% 5 or more ◂ +17.3 pts 14.7%
1.9% 2 bedrooms +1.3 pts ▸ 3.2%
0.0% 1 bedroom +0.3 pts ▸ 0.3%
0.0% Studio / none even 0.0%

Weekly rent distribution

23.0% $350–$549 +23.1 pts ▸ 46.2%
33.1% $550–$749 even 33.1%
29.2% $750 or more ◂ +21.7 pts 7.5%
5.6% $200–$349 +1.4 pts ▸ 7.0%
3.9% Under $200 ◂ +2.7 pts 1.2%

Monthly mortgage distribution

50.5% $3,000 or more ◂ +28.6 pts 21.9%
21.8% $1,800–$2,999 +22.4 pts ▸ 44.2%
11.0% $1,000–$1,799 +8.4 pts ▸ 19.4%
9.3% Under $1,000 +0.7 pts ▸ 10.0%

Transport & Vehicles

No car in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.3 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
1.9% 56th pct 3.2% 64th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.1%
  • First area, 2016: 1.2%
  • First area, 2021: 1.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 4.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 3.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.2%
Work from home in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +3.0 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
32.2% 84th pct 29.2% 79th pct
  • First area, 2011: 7.2%
  • First area, 2016: 9.0%
  • First area, 2021: 32.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 6.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 29.2%
PT commute in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.8 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
1.9% 79th pct 3.8% 88th pct
  • First area, 2011: 6.4%
  • First area, 2016: 5.3%
  • First area, 2021: 1.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 10.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 8.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.8%
PT stops in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +32 more in Kenmore
25 86th pct 57 88th pct
Stops/1k in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.14 more in Kenmore
5.75 81st pct 5.89 81st pct
Departures/1k in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +839.2 more in Kenmore
820.5 84th pct 1,659.6 90th pct
PT routes in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1 more in Kenmore
9 86th pct 10 86th pct
Stop walk in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +5 longer in Fig Tree Pocket
6 36th pct 1 0th pct
Drive to city in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore even
13 9th pct 13 9th pct
Reach 30 min in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +4,345 more in Fig Tree Pocket
13,783 65th pct 9,438 58th pct
Reach 45 min in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +9,085 more in Kenmore
13,783 45th pct 22,868 51st pct
Transit to city in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +4 longer in Fig Tree Pocket
64 64th pct 60 56th pct

How people get to work

44.8% Car (driver) +0.8 pts ▸ 45.7%
32.2% Worked at home ◂ +3.0 pts 29.2%
1.1% Bus +2.1 pts ▸ 3.2%
2.8% Car (passenger) +0.3 pts ▸ 3.1%
1.7% Bicycle ◂ +0.1 pts 1.6%
0.3% Walked +0.7 pts ▸ 1.0%
0.8% Train ◂ +0.3 pts 0.5%

Motor vehicles per home

48.5% 2 vehicles ◂ +2.1 pts 46.4%
20.2% 1 vehicle +12.8 pts ▸ 33.0%
19.6% 3 vehicles ◂ +8.1 pts 11.5%
9.5% 4 or more ◂ +3.7 pts 5.8%
1.9% No vehicle +1.3 pts ▸ 3.2%

Migration & Movement

Recent movers in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.4 pts higher in Kenmore gap narrowing
39.2% 76th pct 39.6% 77th pct
  • First area, 2011: 39.1%
  • First area, 2016: 41.4%
  • First area, 2021: 39.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 37.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 41.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 39.6%
Recent arrivals in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.8 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
13.0% 74th pct 11.3% 69th pct
  • First area, 2011: 18.5%
  • First area, 2016: 13.6%
  • First area, 2021: 13.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 21.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 14.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 11.3%

Jobs & Industry

Unemployment in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.0 pts higher in Kenmore gap steady
3.8% 53rd pct 4.8% 66th pct
  • First area, 2011: 2.9%
  • First area, 2016: 5.5%
  • First area, 2021: 3.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 4.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 6.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.8%
Participation in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.0 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
68.9% 78th pct 67.9% 75th pct
  • First area, 2011: 67.1%
  • First area, 2016: 66.0%
  • First area, 2021: 68.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 65.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 66.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 67.9%
Full-time in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.5 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
59.4% 57th pct 57.9% 49th pct
  • First area, 2011: 59.3%
  • First area, 2016: 61.9%
  • First area, 2021: 59.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 61.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 59.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 57.9%

Industries people work in

17.4% Health care & social assistance ◂ +2.3 pts 15.1%
16.7% Professional & technical ◂ +2.3 pts 14.4%
12.4% Education & training +2.1 pts ▸ 14.5%
7.5% Retail trade ◂ +0.5 pts 6.9%
5.0% Public administration & safety +2.1 pts ▸ 7.1%
5.3% Construction +0.7 pts ▸ 6.0%
5.7% Finance & insurance ◂ +1.6 pts 4.1%
4.9% Accommodation & food +0.5 pts ▸ 5.4%
3.2% Manufacturing +0.4 pts ▸ 3.6%
2.4% Other services +0.8 pts ▸ 3.2%
1.9% Administrative & support +1.3 pts ▸ 3.2%
2.8% Mining ◂ +1.1 pts 1.6%

Occupations people work in

41.6% Professionals ◂ +1.5 pts 40.1%
21.6% Managers ◂ +4.8 pts 16.8%
11.0% Clerical & administrative +0.9 pts ▸ 11.9%
7.3% Community & personal service +1.5 pts ▸ 8.8%
4.9% Technicians & trades +3.0 pts ▸ 7.9%
7.2% Sales workers even 7.2%
3.3% Labourers +1.1 pts ▸ 4.4%
1.3% Machinery operators & drivers +0.6 pts ▸ 1.9%

Walkability

Walk score in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +2.7 higher in Kenmore
3.8 77th pct 6.5 90th pct
Types ≤15 min in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +3.2 more in Kenmore
3.2 73rd pct 6.3 90th pct
15-min city in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +72.9 pts higher in Kenmore
0.6% 58th pct 73.5% 85th pct
Walk to shops in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +51.1 pts higher in Kenmore
5.6% 61st pct 56.7% 81st pct
Walk to transit in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.9 pts higher in Kenmore
95.7% 86th pct 97.6% 92nd pct
Walk to school in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +4.3 pts higher in Kenmore
82.6% 87th pct 86.9% 90th pct
Walk to a park in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +0.2 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket
99.6% 86th pct 99.3% 86th pct
Walk to health in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +65.2 pts higher in Kenmore
0.4% 72nd pct 65.5% 89th pct
Amenities/1k in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +6.1 more in Fig Tree Pocket
23.7 66th pct 17.6 59th pct
Intersections/km² in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +90 higher in Kenmore
69 81st pct 159 89th pct
Mean slope in Fig Tree Pocketin Kenmore +1.6 pts higher in Kenmore
7.7% 68th pct 9.3% 77th pct

Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas

Compare Kenmore with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fig Tree Pocket vs Kenmore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31037/fig-tree-pocket/vs/SAL31504/kenmore