Compare
Fig Tree Pocket vs Sherwood
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Fig Tree Pocket profile · Sherwood profile
Fig Tree Pocket Sherwood
Sherwood and Fig Tree Pocket are neighbouring areas with very different lifestyles. Fig Tree Pocket is a wealthy enclave where the typical household income is $3,791 and 99.4% of homes are separate houses. In contrast, Sherwood is more urban and diverse, with more people living alone (31.3%) and a higher share of renters (36.4%). Sherwood is a walker's paradise, with nearly all homes within 15 minutes of groceries and health services, while Fig Tree Pocket is mostly car-dependent and has far more large homes, with 97.9% having three or more bedrooms.
Both areas have a similar share of children under 15 relative to the national figure. They also share similar employment rates, with around 69% of adults working or looking for work. While they are close in these respects, the two areas have drifted apart in other ways. The gap in typical household income is far higher in Fig Tree Pocket, and Sherwood has seen far more people move in over the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,652
- First area, 2016: 4,045
- First area, 2021: 4,345
- Second area, 2011: 4,998
- Second area, 2016: 5,313
- Second area, 2021: 6,082
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Sherwood: 0.5% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Sherwood: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Sherwood: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Sherwood: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Sherwood: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Sherwood: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Sherwood: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Sherwood: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Sherwood: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Sherwood: 2.9% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Sherwood: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Sherwood: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Sherwood: 3.2% males, 4.2% females
- 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Sherwood: 3.0% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Sherwood: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Sherwood: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Sherwood: 2.7% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Sherwood: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $1,005
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $807
- Second area, 2016: $921
- Second area, 2021: $1,057
- First area, 2011: $2,710
- First area, 2016: $3,038
- First area, 2021: $3,791
- Second area, 2011: $1,720
- Second area, 2016: $1,920
- Second area, 2021: $2,034
- First area, 2011: $2,797
- First area, 2016: $3,313
- First area, 2021: $4,226
- Second area, 2011: $2,360
- Second area, 2016: $2,530
- Second area, 2021: $2,877
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $465
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,815
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,210
- Second area, 2016: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,197
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas
Compare Sherwood with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fig Tree Pocket vs Sherwood [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31037/fig-tree-pocket/vs/SAL32554/sherwood