Compare
Cashmere vs Warner
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.6 km apart · Cashmere profile · Warner profile
Cashmere Warner
Warner and Cashmere are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different layouts and housing profiles. Warner is a more urbanised place, described as somewhat walkable, where 30.3% of households rent and 45.6% of people moved in within the last five years. In contrast, Cashmere is car-dependent, with far fewer renters (5.6%) and a much higher share of homes owned outright (30.7%). This difference in lifestyle is seen in the access to amenities; for example, 47.6% of Warner homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 12.9% in Cashmere.
These two areas have tracked differently since 2011, with the gap in recent arrivals widening as Warner sees a much higher influx of new residents. Despite this, they share many commonalities, such as having almost identical rates of long-term health conditions (about 27%) and very similar typical personal incomes. Both areas also have a similar proportion of people who do not follow a religion, with Warner at 41.1% and Cashmere at 40.1%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,651
- First area, 2016: 4,920
- First area, 2021: 4,970
- Second area, 2011: 8,381
- Second area, 2016: 11,411
- Second area, 2021: 12,264
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cashmere: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Warner: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Cashmere: 0.3% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Warner: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Cashmere: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Warner: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Cashmere: 1.5% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Warner: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Cashmere: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Warner: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Cashmere: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Warner: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Cashmere: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Warner: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Cashmere: 4.6% males, 4.4% females; 50–54 in Warner: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Cashmere: 4.7% males, 5.2% females; 45–49 in Warner: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Cashmere: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Warner: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Cashmere: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Warner: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Cashmere: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Warner: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Cashmere: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Warner: 3.2% males, 4.0% females
- 20–24 in Cashmere: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Warner: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Cashmere: 4.7% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Warner: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Cashmere: 4.4% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Warner: 4.3% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Cashmere: 3.9% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Warner: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Cashmere: 2.7% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Warner: 4.3% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $842
- First area, 2016: $859
- First area, 2021: $1,020
- Second area, 2011: $791
- Second area, 2016: $881
- Second area, 2021: $1,025
- First area, 2011: $2,278
- First area, 2016: $2,430
- First area, 2021: $2,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,889
- Second area, 2016: $2,042
- Second area, 2021: $2,296
- First area, 2011: $2,274
- First area, 2016: $2,447
- First area, 2021: $2,965
- Second area, 2011: $1,932
- Second area, 2016: $2,132
- Second area, 2021: $2,429
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.4
- First area, 2016: 3.3
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $403
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $500
- Second area, 2011: $380
- Second area, 2016: $410
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $2,275
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,200
- Second area, 2011: $2,260
- Second area, 2016: $2,069
- Second area, 2021: $1,980
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cashmere with nearby areas
Compare Warner with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cashmere vs Warner [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30556/cashmere/vs/SAL32991/warner