Compare
Cashmere vs Whiteside
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.9 km apart · Cashmere profile · Whiteside profile
Cashmere Whiteside
Cashmere and Whiteside are neighbouring areas in Moreton Bay, though they differ in age and wealth. Cashmere is more active and affluent, with 74.1% of adults working or looking for work and a typical household income of $2,950. It also has better access to basics, with 34.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school. In contrast, Whiteside is older and more residential, with 23.7% of its people aged 65 and over and a higher share of homes owned outright at 47.8%.
These two areas are seeing their differences in age and home ownership widen over time. Despite this, they share several common traits, such as a high number of detached houses and similar typical mortgage payments. Both areas also have a similar proportion of children under 15 and nearly identical drive times to the city, around 32 to 34 minutes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,651
- First area, 2016: 4,920
- First area, 2021: 4,970
- Second area, 2011: 703
- Second area, 2016: 753
- Second area, 2021: 810
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cashmere: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Whiteside: 0.4% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Cashmere: 0.3% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Whiteside: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Cashmere: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Whiteside: 3.2% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Cashmere: 1.5% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Whiteside: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 65–69 in Cashmere: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Whiteside: 4.6% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Cashmere: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Whiteside: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Cashmere: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Whiteside: 2.7% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Cashmere: 4.6% males, 4.4% females; 50–54 in Whiteside: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Cashmere: 4.7% males, 5.2% females; 45–49 in Whiteside: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Cashmere: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Whiteside: 3.2% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Cashmere: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Whiteside: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Cashmere: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Whiteside: 1.6% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Cashmere: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Whiteside: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Cashmere: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Whiteside: 2.1% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Cashmere: 4.7% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Whiteside: 2.5% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Cashmere: 4.4% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Whiteside: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 5–9 in Cashmere: 3.9% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Whiteside: 5.0% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Cashmere: 2.7% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Whiteside: 2.1% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $842
- First area, 2016: $859
- First area, 2021: $1,020
- Second area, 2011: $641
- Second area, 2016: $742
- Second area, 2021: $838
- First area, 2011: $2,278
- First area, 2016: $2,430
- First area, 2021: $2,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,765
- Second area, 2016: $1,992
- Second area, 2021: $2,312
- First area, 2011: $2,274
- First area, 2016: $2,447
- First area, 2021: $2,965
- Second area, 2011: $1,678
- Second area, 2016: $1,958
- Second area, 2021: $2,312
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.4
- First area, 2016: 3.3
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $403
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $500
- Second area, 2011: $305
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,275
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,200
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,137
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cashmere with nearby areas
Compare Whiteside with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cashmere vs Whiteside [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30556/cashmere/vs/SAL33064/whiteside