Compare
Emerald vs Pakenham Upper
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.6 km apart · Emerald profile · Pakenham Upper profile
Emerald Pakenham Upper
Emerald (Vic.) and Pakenham Upper are neighbouring areas in Victoria with very different layouts. Emerald (Vic.) is much more walkable, with a score of 4.6 (somewhat walkable), and 97.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park. In contrast, Pakenham Upper is car-dependent, with a walkability score of 0.7 and only 20.5% of homes near a park. There are also notable wealth gaps; Pakenham Upper has a far higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (39.2% compared to 27.6% in Emerald (Vic.)), and First Nations personal income is far higher in Pakenham Upper at $2,500, compared to $545 in Emerald (Vic.).
Both areas sit near the national figure for the proportion of people in de facto relationships, with Emerald (Vic.) at 12.4% and Pakenham Upper at 8.8%. They also share similar typical weekly personal incomes, which are $851 in Emerald (Vic.) and $880 in Pakenham Upper. The two areas are also alike in the size of their homes, with both averaging 0.80 people per bedroom.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,813
- First area, 2016: 5,778
- First area, 2021: 5,890
- Second area, 2011: 1,075
- Second area, 2016: 1,172
- Second area, 2021: 1,196
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emerald: 0.7% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Pakenham Upper: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Emerald: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Pakenham Upper: 1.0% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Emerald: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Pakenham Upper: 2.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Emerald: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Pakenham Upper: 3.0% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Emerald: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Pakenham Upper: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Emerald: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Pakenham Upper: 4.9% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Emerald: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Pakenham Upper: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Pakenham Upper: 3.9% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Emerald: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Emerald: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Pakenham Upper: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Emerald: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Emerald: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Pakenham Upper: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Emerald: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 25–29 in Pakenham Upper: 2.0% males, 1.1% females
- 20–24 in Emerald: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Pakenham Upper: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 10–14 in Emerald: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Pakenham Upper: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Emerald: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Pakenham Upper: 3.6% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Emerald: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Pakenham Upper: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $576
- First area, 2016: $673
- First area, 2021: $851
- Second area, 2011: $701
- Second area, 2016: $713
- Second area, 2021: $880
- First area, 2011: $1,419
- First area, 2016: $1,627
- First area, 2021: $2,119
- Second area, 2011: $1,762
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,593
- First area, 2011: $1,601
- First area, 2016: $1,865
- First area, 2021: $2,399
- Second area, 2011: $1,967
- Second area, 2016: $2,181
- Second area, 2021: $2,704
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $160
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $255
- First area, 2011: $1,643
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emerald with nearby areas
Compare Pakenham Upper with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emerald vs Pakenham Upper [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20868/emerald/vs/SAL22029/pakenham-upper