Compare
Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.3 km apart · Beaconsfield Upper profile · Pakenham Upper profile
Beaconsfield Upper Pakenham Upper
Beaconsfield Upper and Pakenham Upper are neighbouring rural areas with distinct layouts. Beaconsfield Upper is more walkable, with 45% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school and 32.1% near groceries, compared to 0% for both in Pakenham Upper. Rent is also well higher in Beaconsfield Upper, where the typical weekly cost is $368, compared to $255 in Pakenham Upper. In contrast, Pakenham Upper has far more public transport options, including 14 stops and 298.5 weekly departures per 1,000 people, while Beaconsfield Upper has none.
The typical weekly household income is similar in both places, sitting at $2,755 in Beaconsfield Upper and $2,593 in Pakenham Upper. However, a gap is widening in First Nations personal incomes, which are far higher in Pakenham Upper at $2,500 compared to $1,125 in Beaconsfield Upper. Both areas share a similar percentage of volunteers and very few residents who speak little or no English, with figures between 0.4% and 0.7%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,843
- First area, 2016: 2,861
- First area, 2021: 2,997
- Second area, 2011: 1,075
- Second area, 2016: 1,172
- Second area, 2021: 1,196
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beaconsfield Upper: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Pakenham Upper: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Beaconsfield Upper: 0.7% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Pakenham Upper: 1.0% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Beaconsfield Upper: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Pakenham Upper: 2.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Beaconsfield Upper: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Pakenham Upper: 3.0% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Beaconsfield Upper: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Pakenham Upper: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Beaconsfield Upper: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Pakenham Upper: 4.9% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Beaconsfield Upper: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Pakenham Upper: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Beaconsfield Upper: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Pakenham Upper: 3.9% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Beaconsfield Upper: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Beaconsfield Upper: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Pakenham Upper: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Beaconsfield Upper: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Beaconsfield Upper: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Pakenham Upper: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Beaconsfield Upper: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Pakenham Upper: 2.0% males, 1.1% females
- 20–24 in Beaconsfield Upper: 3.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Pakenham Upper: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Beaconsfield Upper: 4.5% males, 3.8% females; 15–19 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 10–14 in Beaconsfield Upper: 4.4% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Pakenham Upper: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Beaconsfield Upper: 4.6% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Pakenham Upper: 3.6% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Beaconsfield Upper: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Pakenham Upper: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $700
- First area, 2016: $808
- First area, 2021: $1,001
- Second area, 2011: $701
- Second area, 2016: $713
- Second area, 2021: $880
- First area, 2011: $1,867
- First area, 2016: $2,158
- First area, 2021: $2,755
- Second area, 2011: $1,762
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,593
- First area, 2011: $1,997
- First area, 2016: $2,258
- First area, 2021: $2,862
- Second area, 2011: $1,967
- Second area, 2016: $2,181
- Second area, 2021: $2,704
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $240
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $368
- Second area, 2011: $160
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $255
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,100
- First area, 2021: $2,252
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Beaconsfield Upper with nearby areas
Compare Pakenham Upper with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20176/beaconsfield-upper/vs/SAL22029/pakenham-upper