Compare
Cockatoo vs Pakenham Upper
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.6 km apart · Cockatoo profile · Pakenham Upper profile
Cockatoo Pakenham Upper
Cockatoo (Vic.) and Pakenham Upper are neighbouring rural areas with very different profiles. Pakenham Upper is an older and wealthier place, where 39.2% of households earn $3,000 or more a week and 42.8% of homes are owned outright. In contrast, Cockatoo (Vic.) is younger and more accessible; the typical resident is 36, compared to 44 in Pakenham Upper. Cockatoo (Vic.) also offers more for pedestrians, with a walkability score of 3.0 (mostly car-dependent) and many more homes within a 15-minute walk of schools, health services and groceries.
These two areas have tracked closely since 2011 in several ways. They share very similar typical weekly incomes, around $853 in Cockatoo (Vic.) and $880 in Pakenham Upper. Both are almost entirely made up of separate houses and have the same drive time to the city of about 50 minutes. While Pakenham Upper has a higher share of people aged 65 and over, both areas have seen their First Nations populations stay around 1% of the total.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,400
- First area, 2016: 4,256
- First area, 2021: 4,408
- Second area, 2011: 1,075
- Second area, 2016: 1,172
- Second area, 2021: 1,196
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cockatoo: 0.2% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Pakenham Upper: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Cockatoo: 0.5% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Pakenham Upper: 1.0% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Cockatoo: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Pakenham Upper: 2.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Cockatoo: 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Pakenham Upper: 3.0% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Cockatoo: 2.5% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Pakenham Upper: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Cockatoo: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Pakenham Upper: 4.9% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Cockatoo: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Pakenham Upper: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Cockatoo: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Pakenham Upper: 3.9% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Cockatoo: 3.4% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Cockatoo: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Pakenham Upper: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Cockatoo: 4.2% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Cockatoo: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Pakenham Upper: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Cockatoo: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Pakenham Upper: 2.0% males, 1.1% females
- 20–24 in Cockatoo: 2.6% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Pakenham Upper: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Cockatoo: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Pakenham Upper: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 10–14 in Cockatoo: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Pakenham Upper: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Cockatoo: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Pakenham Upper: 3.6% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Cockatoo: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Pakenham Upper: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $598
- First area, 2016: $694
- First area, 2021: $853
- Second area, 2011: $701
- Second area, 2016: $713
- Second area, 2021: $880
- First area, 2011: $1,305
- First area, 2016: $1,554
- First area, 2021: $1,991
- Second area, 2011: $1,762
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,593
- First area, 2011: $1,486
- First area, 2016: $1,767
- First area, 2021: $2,196
- Second area, 2011: $1,967
- Second area, 2016: $2,181
- Second area, 2021: $2,704
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $320
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2011: $160
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $255
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,600
- First area, 2021: $1,742
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cockatoo with nearby areas
Compare Pakenham Upper with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cockatoo vs Pakenham Upper [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20600/cockatoo/vs/SAL22029/pakenham-upper