Compare
Forest Lodge vs Stanmore
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.8 km apart · Forest Lodge profile · Stanmore profile
Forest Lodge Stanmore
Stanmore and Forest Lodge are neighbouring inner-city areas with a high proportion of renters and university-educated residents. Forest Lodge has a much stronger international character, with 41.4% of people born overseas and 22.1% arriving recently. It is also more densely packed with apartments and has a higher share of renters at 61.1%. Stanmore has a more varied housing mix, with far more separate houses and homes containing three or more bedrooms. It also offers better access to education, with far more schools per 1,000 children than Forest Lodge.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining well above the national figure for typical weekly incomes. They share many everyday similarities, including almost identical proportions of children under 15 and First Nations residents. While both are very close to the city, Forest Lodge is slightly more connected with more street intersections and a higher share of people who do not own a motor vehicle.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,722
- First area, 2016: 4,583
- First area, 2021: 4,965
- Second area, 2011: 7,702
- Second area, 2016: 7,938
- Second area, 2021: 7,619
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Forest Lodge: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Stanmore: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Forest Lodge: 0.4% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Stanmore: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Forest Lodge: 0.7% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Stanmore: 1.2% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Forest Lodge: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Stanmore: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Forest Lodge: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Stanmore: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 60–64 in Forest Lodge: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Stanmore: 2.2% males, 1.8% females
- 55–59 in Forest Lodge: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Stanmore: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Forest Lodge: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Stanmore: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Forest Lodge: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Stanmore: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Forest Lodge: 4.6% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Stanmore: 4.1% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Forest Lodge: 5.9% males, 6.3% females; 35–39 in Stanmore: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Forest Lodge: 6.4% males, 6.7% females; 30–34 in Stanmore: 4.9% males, 5.4% females
- 25–29 in Forest Lodge: 5.9% males, 6.9% females; 25–29 in Stanmore: 5.5% males, 5.9% females
- 20–24 in Forest Lodge: 4.3% males, 4.9% females; 20–24 in Stanmore: 3.4% males, 4.0% females
- 15–19 in Forest Lodge: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Stanmore: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Forest Lodge: 1.6% males, 1.2% females; 10–14 in Stanmore: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 5–9 in Forest Lodge: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Stanmore: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Forest Lodge: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Stanmore: 2.1% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $901
- First area, 2016: $1,063
- First area, 2021: $1,469
- Second area, 2011: $890
- Second area, 2016: $1,067
- Second area, 2021: $1,283
- First area, 2011: $1,773
- First area, 2016: $2,143
- First area, 2021: $2,437
- Second area, 2011: $1,804
- Second area, 2016: $2,179
- Second area, 2021: $2,395
- First area, 2011: $2,613
- First area, 2016: $2,923
- First area, 2021: $3,664
- Second area, 2011: $2,309
- Second area, 2016: $2,656
- Second area, 2021: $3,373
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $440
- First area, 2016: $600
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $390
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $490
- First area, 2011: $3,000
- First area, 2016: $2,900
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,600
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $3,000
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.10
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Forest Lodge with nearby areas
Compare Stanmore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Forest Lodge vs Stanmore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11549/forest-lodge/vs/SAL13665/stanmore