Compare
Forest Lodge vs Pyrmont
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Forest Lodge profile · Pyrmont profile
Forest Lodge Pyrmont
Pyrmont and Forest Lodge are neighbouring inner-city areas with high proportions of university-educated residents. Pyrmont is more culturally diverse, with 52.1% of people born overseas and 39.9% using a language other than English at home. In contrast, Forest Lodge has a much higher share of people with no religion (62.2%) and a larger proportion of adults with a bachelor degree or higher (61.9%). Forest Lodge also has a stronger First Nations presence, with 14.0% of residents speaking a First Nations language.
Everyday life in both places is very similar, as they share nearly identical typical weekly household incomes of around $2,430 and the same number of people per home. They are also both dominated by renters, with about 61% of households renting at a typical weekly cost of around $580 to $590. While Pyrmont is almost entirely made up of flats and apartments, Forest Lodge has a higher share of townhouses. Both areas remain well above the national figure for people working from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,722
- First area, 2016: 4,583
- First area, 2021: 4,965
- Second area, 2011: 11,618
- Second area, 2016: 12,813
- Second area, 2021: 12,658
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Forest Lodge: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Pyrmont: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Forest Lodge: 0.4% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Pyrmont: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Forest Lodge: 0.7% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Pyrmont: 1.3% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Forest Lodge: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Pyrmont: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Forest Lodge: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Pyrmont: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Forest Lodge: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Pyrmont: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Forest Lodge: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Pyrmont: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Forest Lodge: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Pyrmont: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Forest Lodge: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Pyrmont: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Forest Lodge: 4.6% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Pyrmont: 4.3% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Forest Lodge: 5.9% males, 6.3% females; 35–39 in Pyrmont: 6.5% males, 6.1% females
- 30–34 in Forest Lodge: 6.4% males, 6.7% females; 30–34 in Pyrmont: 7.0% males, 6.8% females
- 25–29 in Forest Lodge: 5.9% males, 6.9% females; 25–29 in Pyrmont: 5.8% males, 5.7% females
- 20–24 in Forest Lodge: 4.3% males, 4.9% females; 20–24 in Pyrmont: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Forest Lodge: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Pyrmont: 1.2% males, 1.1% females
- 10–14 in Forest Lodge: 1.6% males, 1.2% females; 10–14 in Pyrmont: 1.3% males, 1.2% females
- 5–9 in Forest Lodge: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Pyrmont: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 0–4 in Forest Lodge: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Pyrmont: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $901
- First area, 2016: $1,063
- First area, 2021: $1,469
- Second area, 2011: $1,095
- Second area, 2016: $1,111
- Second area, 2021: $1,297
- First area, 2011: $1,773
- First area, 2016: $2,143
- First area, 2021: $2,437
- Second area, 2011: $2,186
- Second area, 2016: $2,280
- Second area, 2021: $2,422
- First area, 2011: $2,613
- First area, 2016: $2,923
- First area, 2021: $3,664
- Second area, 2011: $2,528
- Second area, 2016: $2,670
- Second area, 2021: $3,035
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $440
- First area, 2016: $600
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $577
- Second area, 2016: $652
- Second area, 2021: $580
- First area, 2011: $3,000
- First area, 2016: $2,900
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,704
- Second area, 2016: $2,597
- Second area, 2021: $2,800
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.10
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 1.20
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Forest Lodge with nearby areas
Compare Pyrmont with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Forest Lodge vs Pyrmont [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11549/forest-lodge/vs/SAL13297/pyrmont