Compare
Beverly Hills vs Roselands
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.3 km apart · Beverly Hills profile · Roselands profile
Beverly Hills Roselands
Roselands and Beverly Hills are neighboring areas with similar populations, though they differ in their social and economic profiles. Beverly Hills has a higher share of people with no religion (26.3% compared to 13.0% in Roselands) and a higher proportion of adults with a bachelor degree or higher (29.4% versus 22.5%). It also has more homes owned outright and a higher typical weekly family income, which is $2,108 compared to $1,900 in Roselands. In contrast, Roselands is more family-oriented, with a higher share of children under 15 (20.1% versus 16.6%).
Everyday life in both places is very similar, with an almost identical share of First Nations people and nearly the same percentage of residents using a language other than English at home. Both areas also have a high number of people working from home, well above the national figure. While Roselands is more connected by public transport and has more frequent departures, Beverly Hills has more schools per 1,000 children and a higher proportion of homes within a short walk of health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,661
- First area, 2016: 10,156
- First area, 2021: 10,483
- Second area, 2011: 11,167
- Second area, 2016: 11,579
- Second area, 2021: 12,356
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beverly Hills: 1.0% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Roselands: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Beverly Hills: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Roselands: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Beverly Hills: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Roselands: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Beverly Hills: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Roselands: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Beverly Hills: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Roselands: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Beverly Hills: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Roselands: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Beverly Hills: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Beverly Hills: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Roselands: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Beverly Hills: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Roselands: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Beverly Hills: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Roselands: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Beverly Hills: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Roselands: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Beverly Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Beverly Hills: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Roselands: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Beverly Hills: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Roselands: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Beverly Hills: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Beverly Hills: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Roselands: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Beverly Hills: 3.1% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Roselands: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Beverly Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $516
- First area, 2016: $589
- First area, 2021: $701
- Second area, 2011: $486
- Second area, 2016: $544
- Second area, 2021: $666
- First area, 2011: $1,260
- First area, 2016: $1,549
- First area, 2021: $1,862
- Second area, 2011: $1,157
- Second area, 2016: $1,355
- Second area, 2021: $1,685
- First area, 2011: $1,476
- First area, 2016: $1,747
- First area, 2021: $2,108
- Second area, 2011: $1,327
- Second area, 2016: $1,525
- Second area, 2021: $1,900
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $2,100
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,281
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Beverly Hills with nearby areas
Compare Roselands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beverly Hills vs Roselands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10330/beverly-hills/vs/SAL13423/roselands