Compare
Beverly Hills vs Lakemba
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.9 km apart · Beverly Hills profile · Lakemba profile
Beverly Hills Lakemba
Lakemba and Beverly Hills are neighbouring areas with very different housing and social profiles. Lakemba is a young, diverse place where the typical resident is 32 and 59.9% were born overseas. It is dominated by apartments, with 69.8% of homes being flats and 58.1% of households renting. In contrast, Beverly Hills has a typical age of 40 and a stronger focus on home ownership, with 66.6% of homes being separate houses and 36.9% owned outright. Financial gaps are also significant; the typical family income in Beverly Hills is $2,108 per week, which is far higher than the $1,285 seen in Lakemba.
Both areas have almost identical access to the city, with drive times of around 19 minutes and about 52 public transport stops each. Despite this shared convenience, Lakemba is much more walkable, with a 1-minute walk to the nearest stop compared to 4 minutes in Beverly Hills. Lakemba also has a much higher share of recent overseas arrivals at 21.4%, while Beverly Hills has far more people working from home at 39%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,661
- First area, 2016: 10,156
- First area, 2021: 10,483
- Second area, 2011: 15,508
- Second area, 2016: 17,023
- Second area, 2021: 17,092
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beverly Hills: 1.0% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Lakemba: 0.7% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Beverly Hills: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Lakemba: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Beverly Hills: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Lakemba: 1.0% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Beverly Hills: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Lakemba: 1.2% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Beverly Hills: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Lakemba: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 60–64 in Beverly Hills: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Lakemba: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 55–59 in Beverly Hills: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Lakemba: 2.4% males, 1.9% females
- 50–54 in Beverly Hills: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Lakemba: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 45–49 in Beverly Hills: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Lakemba: 3.1% males, 2.1% females
- 40–44 in Beverly Hills: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Lakemba: 4.7% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Beverly Hills: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Lakemba: 5.1% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Beverly Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Lakemba: 5.7% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Beverly Hills: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Lakemba: 5.6% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Beverly Hills: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Lakemba: 3.4% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Beverly Hills: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Lakemba: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Beverly Hills: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Lakemba: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Beverly Hills: 3.1% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Lakemba: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 0–4 in Beverly Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Lakemba: 5.1% males, 4.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $516
- First area, 2016: $589
- First area, 2021: $701
- Second area, 2011: $357
- Second area, 2016: $427
- Second area, 2021: $521
- First area, 2011: $1,260
- First area, 2016: $1,549
- First area, 2021: $1,862
- Second area, 2011: $849
- Second area, 2016: $1,012
- Second area, 2021: $1,227
- First area, 2011: $1,476
- First area, 2016: $1,747
- First area, 2021: $2,108
- Second area, 2011: $888
- Second area, 2016: $1,052
- Second area, 2021: $1,285
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,100
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,495
- Second area, 2016: $1,600
- Second area, 2021: $1,712
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.60
- Second area, 2016: 1.40
- Second area, 2021: 1.40
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Beverly Hills with nearby areas
Compare Lakemba with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beverly Hills vs Lakemba [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10330/beverly-hills/vs/SAL12266/lakemba